Archival Research: A Community of Community Museums?

After a very intensive week in the Dawson City Museum (DCM) archives, I am sorting, reading, and analyzing what I found. The documents scanned are interesting and contributing to the narrative(s) about the DCM’s development. In order to help with the analysis, the “Archival Research” series considers the stories archival materials tell, looking at the items I found most exciting.  

Within this post, I continue to look at the tensions between centralization (support for a territorial museum) and decentralization (support for a network of museums) within Yukon community museum policy. The first post on this topic is available here.

I am looking at the Minister of Tourism’s response to advocacy against exhibitions within a territorial Historic Resources Centre in 1989. Here are some excerpts from the letter, which I find most salient:

The following excerpts are quotes in the letter from the Yukon Historical and Museums Association’s (YHMA) advocacy on the topic:

Webster, Art. 1989, December 19. Letter to the President of the YHMA. YHMA museums committee. Box 16. Dawson City Museum Archives.

Why is this letter interesting?

I find this letter interesting because it demonstrates that, like the Dawson City Museum, the Yukon Historical and Museums Association (YHMA) was arguing against the development of a territorial museum or related institution in the late 1980s.

The Yukon Museums Policy (1989) mentions a Historic Resources Service Center, which would support the community museum sector. It states:

One of the Historic Resources Service Centre’s functions would be to support community museums by providing specialized services or services which are more economical when centralized. Such services would include a specialized computer data base for artifact collection management, and conservation support programs.

Museums Policy, 2

The YHMA had advocated for a Centre with this function in 1984 as part of heritage legislation consultations, stating:

YHMA RECOMMENDS that Government of Yukon act on these recommendations at the earliest possible time and that a Heritage Resource Centre be constructed which would minimally include facilities for collections management of archaeological and paleontological materials, as well as the capability to provide advice and assistance to community museums, as requested by them.

YHMA 1984, 23

Importantly, they did not advocate for a public education and display function, which was added to the Museums Policy (1989). The Policy gives the Centre a second function, stating:

Another function would be to provide public display and educational facilities as a means of heightening public awareness of Yukon’s historic resources.

Museums Policy, 2

The YHMA advocated against this function, expressing surprise at its inclusion. As quoted in the letter above:

All of the sudden it is going to the House looking more like the seeds of a Territorial Museum than a service centre for the heritage community.

See letter above

At the time (as a result of advocacy perhaps?), plans for a historic resource centre were not implemented.

Is there broader relevance?

The advocacy’s relevance is most apparent when compared to the YHMA’s reaction to a contemporary proposal for a Heritage Center. The re-elected Liberal’s promised a centralized Centre for “maintaining, conserving, exhibiting and interpreting” the Yukon’s collection as part of their election campaign (source).

The YHMA included a question about this proposal in their questions for parties during the campaign period. Here is the question and response:

Source

Despite the question, I have found no evidence (yet?) the YHMA is campaigning against the centre, leading to a few questions:

  • Is the YHMA still actively advocating for community museums?
  • Is the creation of a museum-like institution no longer a concern for Yukon community museums?

I do not know the answers, but think the questions are relevant because they speak to a broader question – Is there a community of community museums working together in Yukon? In 1989, the answer seems to be yes. Currently, the answer seems less clear.

Questions

What do you think? Are these the same lessons you draw from the letter? Do you have potential answers to my questions?

References

Webster, Art. 1989, December 19. Letter to the President of the YHMA. YHMA museums committee. Box 16. Dawson City Museum Archives.

Yukon Historical and Museums Association. 1984. A Submission to the Government of Yukon Concerning the Proposed New Heritage Legislation.

Archival Research: Arguments Against Centralization

After a very intensive week in the Dawson City Museum (DCM) archives, I am sorting, reading, and analyzing what I found. The documents scanned are interesting and contributing to the narrative(s) about the DCM’s development. In order to help with the analysis, the “Archival Research” series considers the stories archival materials tell, looking at the items I found most exciting.  

Within this post, I am looking at the Dawson City Museum’s submission to territorial museum policy consultations in 1986. In particular, I am considering their arguments against centralization – that is, the first two points in their submission. Here is an excerpt:

Dawson City Museum Board of Trustees. 1986, April 16. Letter to Lord Cultural Resources Planning and Management. Yukon museums planning study. Box 10. Dawson City Museum Archives.

Why is the submission interesting?

In order to understand why the submission is interesting, it is important to understand the history of territorial support to community museums up to the 1980s and how this support differed from other subnational governments.

When Yukon began museum policy consultations in 1986, it did not have any kind of territorial museum. However, it had supported community museums – that is, the Dawson City Museum and the MacBride Museum in Whitehorse – since the 1960s. The support was part of its tourism policy, which I discuss in the post: What rationale underlines and legitimizes government action targeting community museums in Yukon?

When the Yukon Historical and Museums Association formed in 1977, it began to advocate for a territorial museums advisor and policy. In particular, they commissioned the Kyte report in 1980, which called for the development of a museum policy.

As a result, the territorial government began to reorganize in 1981, forming a Heritage Branch for the first time in a short lived Department of Heritage and Cultural Resources. The Department and Branch were formed with the explicit intent to help museums access more federal funding. A Minister stated:

The department will hope to have a liaison function, and a facilitating function. For instance, through the Department, we hope that we will have more access to federal money.

YLA 24.4.20

The Northwest Territories had already opened a territorial museum with federal funds, leading to an opposition member remarking:

When I was last in Yellowknife, in the Northwest Territories, I went through a museum building that is an excellent building. It is obviously a multi-multi-million dollar complex, built with federal funds. I wonder if the Minister is negotiating with the federal a similar building in Yukon?

YLA 24.4.20

The Minister responded by describing a quandary in the Yukon – that is, should there be a centralized or dispersed system of museums. She responded:

I do not know. There is a quandary in the Yukon whether the museums should be as they are now, in different places, or whether there should be one, big Territorial Museum.

YLA 24.4.20

Importantly, the Minister in question represented the Klondike – that is, the Dawson City Museum’s jurisdiction. And, as stated above, the Dawson City Museum was very much against centralization, which they feared would re-direct support away from museums outside of Whitehorse.

The new Branch continued to support the dispersed museum system, developing museum programs to help existing institutions better access federal support in the mid 1980s. Community museums began receiving operational funding as community museums rather than one kind of tourist attraction.

The eventual Yukon Museums Policy (1989) affirmed this commitment to a network of museums, stating:

The Yukon Government is committed to the integrity of strong, independent community museums operated by local, non-profit volunteer boards. 

Museums Policy

In other words, in theory the Dawson City Museum got what it advocated for – a museum policy committed to a decentralized museum structure and no territorial museum.

Is there broader relevance?

In practice, Yukon has implemented a decentralized museum policy with staff mandated to support museums and funding for both operations and special projects. However, staff remained centralized in Whitehorse, despite the Dawson City Museum’s advocacy against this centralization. For example, a president’s report from 1993 stated:

Our efforts to decentralize parts of the Heritage Branch to Dawson City are continuing. In particular, we feel that the Territorial Registration Advisor’s position should be based in Dawson. With over half of the Yukon’s collection located here, and so much work to be done in registration and cataloguing of the collection, we believe that the Heritage Branch should be locating more resource people in Dawson.

DCM Newsletter, vol. 11 no. 2

The DCM’s efforts to decentralize staff were not successful.

Importantly, the Dawson City Museum’s concern that a centralized system may divert resources from decentralized community museums remains relevant. In the 1990s, Yukon began to develop museum-like territorial institutions. The Yukon Arts Center, which hosts exhibits, opened in 1992. The Beringia Interpretive Centre, which exhibits Yukon’s natural heritage, opened in 1997. During interviews, I heard concerns that these centers divert Heritage Branch resources and focus Yukon support on their own salaried positions.

More recently, re-elected Liberals promised a new Arts and Heritage Centre as part of their campaign (source). Further, there is no longer a true Museum Advisor position as the Manager of Museums and Manager of Heritage positions have become merged, meaning the responsible person has a broad range of responsibilities.

I do not have a conclusion here, but rather a concern. What does the creation of centralized heritage centers mean for the support of a decentralized community museum system?

Questions

What do you think? Are these the same lessons you draw from the submission? Do you think this is an important event in the development of the Dawson City Museum in relation to government policy?

Archival Research: Community Mobilized

After a very intensive week in the Dawson City Museum (DCM) archives, I am sorting, reading, and analyzing what I found. The documents scanned are interesting and contributing to the narrative(s) about the DCM’s development. In order to help with the analysis, the “Archival Research” series considers the stories archival materials tell, looking at the items I found most exciting.  

Within this post, I build on my considerations of Director task saturation and the obstacles community museums face. I am looking at letters sent to the territorial government advocating for more support to the Dawson City Museum at a time when the Museum faced severe financial difficulties. Importantly, Museum representatives sent these letters (e.g., board members and the Director), but so did community members and organizations.

For example, Bombay Peggy’s Victorian Inn & Pub wrote a general letter of support stating:

As a business involved in tourism we view the Dawson City Museum as a key attraction as well as an essential community organization dedicated to preserving and interpreting our heritage. Not only have we sent visitors to see its exhibits and to research relatives
involved in the Gold Rush at its archives, but we, ourselves, have used the museum's services to research the building we restored in which to house our business. We have also called upon museum staff to go well beyond the call of duty and take visitors through
the exhibits during the winter months when they are officially closed to the public, a task
they have always been happy to do.
2002, January. Letter to whom it may concern. O & M Correspondence. Box 29b. Dawson City Museum Archives.

Providing another example, the Dawson City Chamber of Commerce wrote to the Premier of Yukon, stating:

The Dawson Museum is recognized as one of the primary heritage attractions in the
Yukon. As well, they have the largest collectiun of artifacts in the Territory and are home
to the Klondike History Library. Their Archival Facility has allowed thousands of people
to research their family history, allowing them to access information that perbaps could
have been lost forever. Locals and visitors alike have been able to glimpse into the past
and experience the victories and hardshipsprevious generations of Klondike bound
travelers have endured. In addition to all of this, the Dawson Museum bas just been
named as a National Historic Site. It is very clear to our members that projects and
initiatives underaken by the Dawson City Museum & Hstorncal Sociery benefit Yukon
citizens tremendously.
In an effort to ensure continued operations, The Dawson Museum has worked hard to
increase attendance, enhance Gift Shop sales and annually coordinate fundraising
auctions, among other initiatives. Many localbusinesses support the Museums ventures
through corporate membership while they alsohave struggled to stay open for business
during these tough economic times
2002, March. O & M Correspondence. Box 29b. Dawson City Museum Archives

Why are these letters interesting?

In the early 2000s, the Dawson City Museum (DCM) failed to receive expected grants partway through a project. It also experienced unanticipated difficulties, such as a bug infestation. 

As a result, the Museum was in a dire financial position and sought additional support from the territorial government. Representatives and supporters engaged in a letter writing campaign (see examples above) and media interviews to address the immediate problem – that is, a lack of funding to pay for staff. 

The territorial government and its representatives were far less supportive than they had been when the Museum faced difficulties in 1979 – 1980. To some extent, Yukon helped address the cash shortfall by letting the DCM reallocate some of its project funding. However, the responses to requests for additional funding and advocacy for change were, at times, hostile.

For example, while vocalizing a willingness to assist, the Deputy Minister stated: 

We are sorry to hear that the museum has gotten itself into financial difficulty.

Brenan 2001

Further, responses tended to emphasize capital contributions as impressive when the Museum and its allies were advocating for operational support. 

Despite the territorial government’s unwillingness to respond with more support, community organizations continued to advocate for the Museum. For example, the Premier responded to the Dawson City Chamber of Commerce’s letter above and outlined the support already provided to the DCM. The Chamber of Commerce was not deterred and continued to advocate, showing an understanding of the Museum’s plight – that is, a need for operational funding. They wrote:

You clearly stated in your letter the ways that the Territorial government assists the
Dawson Museum; by providing spaceat low costs, and contributing financial support for
the museum's gift shop, (allowing them to generate more earned revenue). As mentioned
in our original letter, we do appreciatethe current YTG funding for operating funds but
frankly, it's not enough. Looking at the increase in operating costs over the past ten years
for a museum that has grown to become a primary heritage attraction in the Yukon, how
can you expect a Museum to implement more programs and projects, maintain operating
costs of these initiatives as well as uphold adequate administrative staff and technical
support whie utilizing the sameamount of funds year after year?
In an effort to earn more revenue, the Museum works continuously to raise money
through lotteries. When all is said and done, the money raised scarcely pays the bills.
When applying for larger lottery applications, the museum is forced to withdrawal due to
criteria that seems to contradict itself. For example, it is discouraged to allow proceeds to
be spent on salaries, which in fact is the Museum's single largest category of
expenditures. The Museum Board hasestablished hiring more full-time permanent staff
as their highest priority, but criteria divert them from supporting this goal. It appears no
matter where they turn, there is always something that detours them.
2002, August. Letter to the Premier. O & M Correspondence. Box 29b. Dawson City Museum Archives.

In short, the Dawson City business community responded to the Museum’s problems with letters showing an understanding of its plight and commitment to standing with the Museum in face of opposition.

Is there broader relevance?

In 2002, the letters did not lead to additional territorial support and the Director was let go. However, about a year later – that is, for the 2003-2004 fiscal year – the Museum’s operating grant increased from $23,500 to $80,000.

While the increase happened as part of a new Museum Strategy, its likely these letters and the Dawson City Museum’s plight during the consultation process had some effect in contributing to the change. I have not found anything indicating causation, but there is clearly a correlation between an advocacy effort by one of the most well established museums in the territory and then an increase to the museum program only a year later.

As such, I believe the examples demonstrate the importance of community mobilization in advocacy.

Questions

What do you think? Are these the same lessons you draw from the letter? Do you think this is an important event in the development of the Dawson City Museum?

References

Brenan, Dan. 2001, August. “Letter to DCM.” O&M correspondence. Box 29b. DCM.

Case Study: Dawson City Museum Timeline, 1990s

Last Updated: January 24, 2022

As part of the Dawson City Museum Project, I am creating timelines of the Museum’s development in relation to government policy and community action (1950s, 1960s, 1970s, 1980s, 1990s, 2000s, 2010s).

Museum Operations

In some ways, the 1990s were the Golden Years for the Museum. Due to the availability of project grants and employment funding, the Dawson City Museum (DCM) was a flurry of activity. In particular, the DCM expanded the resources available and established a library, digitized collection records, engaged in cataloguing work, renewed exhibitions, and started a major capital project.

Notably, the DCM did not experience the effects of government austerity measures, which are typically described by museum workers as defining the 1990s, until the end of the decade. The difference is likely due to the funding and attention associated with Centennial celebrations in Yukon during that time.

  • 1990:

    Collections

    Using Small Capital Grants from the territorial government, the Museum engaged in cataloguing work and train stabilization (Directors Report February 27, 1990). There was concern about the condition of the outdoor artifacts – that is, the trains – and a desire for a protective structure (Director’s Report October 23 1990).

    The Museum accessioned 1,295 artifacts (Collection Committee Report May 3 1991). Highlights from the year’s acquisitions included (Collection Committee Report May 3 1991):

    • KVA document collection
    • a 1919 unused calendar from Robert Service
    • Big Alex McDonald’s cash register
    • a NWMP tunic
    • a program from the 1st Percy DeWolf memorial mail race, autographed by the participants and volunteers

    Digitization

    The Museum received funding to buy a computer and funded staff / board member enrollment in Yukon College computer courses (Directors Report February 27, 1990; Director’s Report March 27 1990).

    Exhibitions

    Using Small Capital Grants from the territorial Government, the Museum developed a model train display, a nightlife display, and signage for the train display (Directors Report February 27, 1990). The Museum received capital funding to upgrade the permanent exhibitions and photographs on display (Director’s Report June 26 1990).

    Temporary exhibitions in the court room included (Director’s Report May 15 1990):

    • the Dawson City Music Festival art auction
    • Kennedy Bradshaw Yukon Friends photography show
    • Annual Art Show
    Exhibits and Displays. Box 16. Dawson City Museum Archives.

    Grants received

    The Museum Received the following grants in 1990/91 (Director’s Report 1990 AGM):

    GranterPurposeAmount
    YTG – Heritage BranchDirector’s Wage support$14,000
    YTG – Heritage BranchOperations & Maintenance$4,000
    YTG – Heritage BranchDirector’s Professional Development$1,000
    YTG – Heritage BranchCatalogue Project $4,000
    YTG – Heritage BranchDisplay Photograph re vamp $10,915
    YTG – Heritage BranchExhibitions Upgrading Project $11,128
    YTG – Heritage BranchEquipment/Book Purchase$2,490
    YTG – Heritage BranchStorage Facility Development Project $20,000
    FederalCanada Job Development?
    FederalChallenge Grant$20,712
    FederalResource Room Worker20 weeks
    Lotteries YukonAdmin Assistance – wage support$2,100
    Lotteries YukonBook Purchase$700
    Canadian Council of ArchivesArchival backlog reduction$19,400
    YTG – Community Development FundPhoto finding aid Part II$44, 480

    Programming (Other)

    The Museum hosted CCI workshops on mounting techniques and furniture restoration (Directors Report January 9, 1990).

    Using Small Capital Grants from the territorial Government, the Museum worked on a slide show of the Twelve Mile Ditch (Directors Report February 27, 1990).

    Staffing

    The Museum continued to use employment grants for staffing. For example, in 1990 Museum staff included (Directors Report January 9, 1990, Directors Report February 27, 1990; Director’s Report May 15 1990):

    • a Job Creation grant provided 17 weeks for a photography project and office assistance;
    • a Community Development Fund (CDF) grant provided three positions – photography supervisor, photographer, and archivist technician;
    • a later CDF provided funding for a photo finding aid project, which included work for 2 photographers and 2 cataloguers;
    • a photographer through a 5 week Canadian Council of Archives grant
    • a Yukon Employment Incentives Program provided funding for a research librarian;
    • Lotteries Yukon provided funding for an Administrative Assistant;
    • Student employees (four tour guide, one research librarian, and one maintenance worker) through the Challenge 90 program; and
    • a capital contribution grant from YTG provided funding for a cataloguer to work for 8 weeks on the existing backlog.
  • 1991:

    Exhibitions

    The Museum held the following art shows (DCM Minutes July 9 1991):

    • Halin DeRepentigny Art Exhibit
    • Danielle Shula’s art show
    • Yukon Expressions

    Collections

    From 1986 to 1991 the Museum had spent over $400,000 on collections management with only $60,000 contributed directly from the Museum (DCM Minutes October 24 1991).

    The Museum engaged in the Registration Test Project. The territorial Collections Registration Co-ordinator facilitated the project, which involved three people hired to catalogue more than 800 artifacts (Acting Director’s Report April 29, 1992).

    Using a Community Development Fund Grant, the Museum worked on reproducing its original photograph collection and creating an index. Examples included the Chief Isaac Family Collection (YHMA 1991):

    The Museum also received funding from Yukon Lotteries and the Heritage Branch to expand their resource library (YHMA 1991).

    Programming (Other)

    The Museum hired a photographer to develop the sound slide show “Dawson at Forty Degrees Below Zero,” which was designed to answer what the City was like in winter.

    The Museum implemented a lecture series to raise community awareness of the Museum (AGM Minutes April 29 1992). Topics included (YHMA 1991, September):

    • Early Placer Mining Techniques
    • Building of the White Pass & Yukon Railway
    • Yukon Prehistory
    • Dredge No. 4
    • Yukon Ditch

    Governance

    The Museum struggled to have a display committee (DCM Minutes July 27 1991 and August 21 1991).

  • 1992:

    Building

    The Museum upgraded their security system with funding from the Heritage Branch (YHMA 1992a). They also planned to upgrade their storage facilities (YHMA 1992b).

    The Victory Garden was completed, changing the space around the Museum (DCM Newsletter vol. 11 no. 2).

    Collections

    The Museum created a finding aid for the Caley Collection, which included rare books, papers, business ledgers, maps, and newspapers (DCM Newsletter Vol. 10 no. 4).

    Using a Community Development Fund Grant, the Museum worked to make Mining Recorders Records more accessible (DCM Newsletter vol. 11 no. 2).

    Exhibitions

    The Museum opened its visible storage exhibit (DCM Newsletter vol. 10 no. 6).

    The Museum opened its visible storage exhibit (DCM Newsletter Vol. 10 no. 6).

    Programming (Other)

    The Museum offered a workshop on photo conservation with funding from the Canadian Council of Archives and a presenter from the National Archives (DCM Newsletter vol. 11 no. 1).

    Research

    DCM Newsletter vol. 11 no. 2

  • 1993:

    Exhibitions

    The Museum received Museums Assistance Program funding to begin researching and designing Klondike Gold – a traveling exhibition celebrating the anniversary of the Gold Rush (DCM Newsletter vol. 11 no. 2).

    The Museum hosted an exhibition of paintings in the court room for the summer (DCM Newsletter vol. 11 no. 2).

    The Museum developed an exhibition marking the centennial of the Yukon Order of Pioneers, which was installed around Dawson City (See documents available in YTG YOOP exhibit, Box 21a, Dawson City Museum Archives).

    Collections

    Using grants from the Canadian Council of Archives, the Museum worked to upgrade archival storage and produce an inventory (DCM Newsletter vol. 11 no. 2).

    “Klondike” Kate Rockwell’s dress (below) returned from receiving conservation treatment at the Canadian Conservation Institute (DCM Newsletter vol. 11 no. 3).

    Programming (Other)

    The Museum hosted an oral history workshop (DCM Newsletter vol. 11 no. 1).

    The Museum worked to provide curriculum linked programming (DCM Newsletter vol. 11 no. 2):

    DCM Newsletter vol. 11 no. 2

    The lecture series continued.

    The Museum acquired a gold-melting furnace for the upcoming traveling exhibition. In order to trial the device, the Museum had gold-pouring demonstrations during the summer (DCM Newsletter vol. 11 no. 3).

    DCM Newsletter vol. 11 no. 3

    The Museum began to have live performances in the space, which were a main attraction. The most popular performance was called Discovery Claims, which involved multiple characters claiming to have found the first nugget (DCM Newsletter vol. 11 no. 3).

  • 1995:

    Building

    The Museum installed a fire suppression and sprinkler system with funding from the territorial heritage branch and Department of Canadian Heritage (YHMA 1994). For more information see: Fire vs. Heritage.

    Exhibitions

    Klondike Gold – a DCM traveling exhibition celebrating the 100th anniversary of the discovery of gold in the Yukon – was at the Yukon Arts Centre. The exhibition included a CD ROM game with films, photos, and archival records (YHMA 1994, December).

    The permanent exhibitions “received a facelift.” For example:

    DCM Newsletter vol. 12 no. 1

    The Museum hosted two special exhibitions – “Too Thick to Drink, Too Think To Plow” and “Sketchbooks by George Back (1796-1878) Overland to the Arctic with Sir John Franklin” (DCM Newsletter vol. 12 no. 1).

    Programming (Other)

    The Museum collaborated with Dawson First Nation and the YHMA on a conference about life on the River.

    The Museum began to partner with Parks Canada to supply dramatic performances for their interpretive tours in Dawson (DCM Newsletter vol. 12 no. 1; see documents available in 95 seed challenge, Box 23b, Dawson City Museum Archives).

    Staffing

    In 1994/95 the Museum employed 50 people with payroll of $344,180 (DCM Newsletter vol. 12 no. 1).

  • 1996:

    Collections

    With funding from the Heritage Branch, the Museum worked on registering the collections in storage and data entry of the collections records (YHMA 1996).

    Exhibitions

    With funding from the Heritage Branch, the Museum upgraded their Klondike Railway Train exhibit (YHMA 1996).

    Staffing

    The Museum continued to use short term grants or staffing. For example:

    • The Canada/Yukon Summer Career Placement Program provided 103 work weeks for nine University students who worked in interpretation and the gift shop (Swackhammer 1996a).
    • The first Young Canada Works in Heritage offered through the Canadian Museums Association provided 49 work weeks for five high school students. They worked as a cataloguer’s assistant and as part of the interpretation / gift shop team (Swackhammer 1996b).
  • 1997:

    Exhibitions

    The Museum hosted a photography exhibition – “Neath the Midnight Sun” with help from the Yukon Arts Branch (DCM Newsletter vol. 13 no. 2).

    The Museum opened “A New Look at Old Landscapes – the glacial history of the Dawson Region” (DCM Newsletter Nov. 1997).

  • 1998:

    Building

    Although the Museum had occupied the Old Territorial Administration Building (OTAB) since 1962, it did not have a lease. At the request of Yukon Property Management, they entered negotiations that started at a rent of $10,000 (DCM Minutes 14 January 1998).

    The Museum began a multi-year process to upgrade the train shelter and conserve the locomotives with funding from the Community Development Fund, Heritage Branch, and Museums Assistance Program (DCM Newsletter vol. 14 no. 1).

    The Museum also began a new storage facility with funding from the Lind Family Foundation and Community Development Fund, but weather caused delays (DCM Newsletter vol. 14 no. 1).

    Exhibitions

    The Museum worked with the Robert Service School to create a Family Treasures Exhibit (Annual General Meeting Director’s Report 1999).

    The Museum’s traveling exhibit – Klondike Gold – went to the West Vancouver Museum (Heritage Vancouver 1998).

    Library

    Museum donors, donating books and other resources, asked the Museum to develop an appropriate history library to house the collection alongside the Museum’s archives and other resources (DCM Minutes 14 January 1998). The Library was dedicated in July (DCM Minutes 8 July 1998).

    Programming (other)

    The Museum hosted or participated in 16 events from May to October, such as the Canadian Museums Association study tour and conference (Annual General Meeting Director’s Report 1999).

    Throughout 1998, the Museum held special programming associated with the centennial of the Klondike Gold Rush (DCM Newsletter Nov. 1997).

    Staffing

    The Museum provided employment for 28 people with a payroll over $250,000 (Annual General Meeting Director’s Report 1999).

  • 1999:

    Governance

    The Museum adopted a new statement of intent (DCM Newsletter Vol. 15 no. 1).

    Grants

    GranterPurposeAmount
    YTG – Heritage BranchOperations & Maintenance$23,00
    YTG – Heritage BranchMove & Shelving$145,000
    YTG – Heritage BranchLind Galery$15,000
    YTG – Heritage BranchRegistration Support$15,000
    Lotteries YukonLind Gallery$20,000
    City of DawsonOperating$10,000
    Federal – Museums Assistance ProgrammeMove & Shelving$48,600
    Federal – HRDCSupper Career Placement$13923
    Canadian Museums AssociationYoung Canada Works$2,334
    Canadian Museums AssociationProfessional Development$750
    Canadian Library AssociationYoung Canada Works$2,406
    Heritage Canada FoundationYoung Canada Works$2,406
    Canadian Council of ArchivesYoung Canada Works$2,406
    Canadian Council of ArchivesControl of Holdings$4,077
    Yukon Historical and Museums AssociationProfessional Development$750
    Klondike Regional Training Trust FundProfessional Development$750
    FoundationProfessional Development$750
    DCM AGM May 2000

    Staffing

    The Museum continued to access employment programs, including Young Canada Works grants from the Canadian Museums Association, the Canadian Council of Archives, and the Canadian Library Association. A grant from the Heritage Branch enabled the Museum to hire people for collections work (DCM Newsletter vol. 15 no. 2).

Government Policy

First Nation

Federal

In past research, federal cuts to cultural funding emerged as highly significant to museum development in the 1990s. Surprisingly, these have been mentioned very little in interviews and documents related to the Dawson City Museum Project.

  • 1990:

    Canadian Conservation Institute (CCI)

    The CCI presented:

    • “Artifact Mounting Workshop” at the Dawson City Museum (CCI 1990, September).
    • “Field Conservation Techniques” at the Canadian Archaeological Association Conference in Whitehorse (CCI 1991, March).
    • “Emergency and Disaster Planning in Museums” at the Old Log Church Museum in Whitehorse (CCI 1991, March).

    Museums Assistance Program (MAP)

    A MAP employee conducted a security review of the Dawson City Museum (Acting Director’s Report April 29, 1992).

    Parks Canada

    In 1984, Parks Canada had been asked to store objects, such as an oil painting, for the Museum as it conducted renovations for the period of the renovation. In 1990, three years after the Museum’s re-opening, Parks Canada still had the oil painting (see documents available in admin correspondence KNHS. Box 17b. Dawson City Museum Archives).

  • 1995:

    Museums Assistance Program (MAP)

    There were cuts to MAP and then the Minister of Canadian Heritage did not attend a Canadian Museums Association conference. The museum community had a moment of silence for MAP, putting a black ribbon on the podium (McAcvity 1995).

    Parks Canada

    Parks Canada began to reduce its public presentations and street theater (Swackhammer 1995).

  • 1996:

    Employment Policy

    The Canadian Museums Association administered Young Canada Works for the first time (see documents available in YCW CMA 1996, Box 23, Dawson City Museum Archives).

  • 1997

    Employment Policy

    Human Resources and Development Canada reduced the Dawson City Museum Summer Career Placement grants by 39 % (DCM Newsletter vol. 13 no. 2).

  • 1999:

    Cultural Policy

    A Sense of Place, A Sense of Being – The Evolving Role of the Federal Goverament in Support of Culture released

    Parks Canada

    Parks Canada published Draft Management Plans for the Dawson City Historical Complex and Dredge no. 4 (DCM Newsletter vol. 15 no. 3).

Canada – Yukon

  • 1990:

    Explicit Museum Policy

    Federal support influenced the development of territorial support for artifact inventory:

    The second initiative is under the artifact inventory catalogue project. We have received a grant from the federal museums assistance programs that will provide 100 percent of the cost to undertake a planning pilot project for the registration and automation of museum collection record.

    YLA 27.2.17

    At the request of the Territorial Museum Advisor, staff from the federal Museum Assistance Program conducted a security evaluation of the Dawson City Museum (Kelly 1990).

  • 1994:

    Explicit Museum Policy

    The territorial Heritage Branch sponsored Canadian Conservation Institute Workshops (YHMA 1994).

Territorial

During the 1990s, the territorial government continued the museum policy and programs established in the 1980s with new programs related to federal support (see above). Importantly, the 1990s involved support and attention to anniversaries in the territory.

  • 1990:

    Explicit Museum Policy

    The YTG Museum budget decreased by 43% (Directors Report January 9, 1990). The Heritage Branch’s Director reported on these cuts at the Dawson City Museum’s annual general meeting in April, advising the Museum to seek funding from alternative sources like the Community Development Fund. He also suggested the Museum develop a traveling exhibition on the Gold Rush due to the importance of the Yukon Anniversaries Commission (AGM Minutes April 27 1990)

    The territorial conservator helped the Dawson City Museum with projects (Director’s Report March 27 1990).

  • 1991:

    Explicit Museum Policy

    The territorial government hired a Collections Registration Coordinator to facilitate the Artifact Inventory and Cataloguing project for the Heritage Branch (see documents in Admin correspondence director misc. Box 17b. Dawson City Museum Archives).

    Heritage Policy

    Historic Resources Act

  • 1992:

    Explicit Museum Policy

    Museums Artifact Conservation Policy

    Tourism / Museum Policy

    The Yukon Gold Explorers Passport Program was introduced (and continues today).

    Yukon Lotteries Commission

    The Yukon Lotteries Commission (YLC) met with representatives from the City of Whitehorse and Yukon Recreation Advisory Committee (YRAC) to consider a request from the MacBride Museum for increased support to administration wages for winter programming. The YLC issued a statement with the YRAC saying:

    Y.R.A.C. and Y.L.C. are not receptive to the idea of being responsible for providing ongoing operating and maintenance grants to Yukon museums. In fact, we believe that operating grants to museums are the joint responsibility of the Heritage Branch of Y.T.G. and the community in which the museum is located.

    Beaumont 1994
  • 1994:

    Explicit Museum Policy

    The Heritage Branch funding focused on the decade of anniversaries, including the museums exhibit assistance program. For example:

    Specifically, support will be provided to the MacBride Museum for their Northwest Mounted Police/RCMP travelling exhibit, to the Dawson City Museum for their Klondike gold rush anniversary travelling exhibit and to one of my favourite museums, the Keno Museum, to complete the new exhibit development work

    YLA 28.2.80

    There were funding programs titled:

    • Museums Assistance, which included “for the Dawson Museum, the Yukon Order ofPioneers centennial exhibit was $12,200; the sprinkler design was $10,000; self-guided tours was $7,800; computer upgrade, $2,500” (YLA 28.1.81).
    • Exhibits Assistance, which included “$35,000 for the Dawson City Museum for a gold discovery exhibit” (YLA 28.1.81).
    • Artifact Inventory and Cataloguing
    • Conservation and Security

    Yukon Lottery Commission

    The Yukon Lottery Commission restated their position that museums are the responsibility of the Heritage Branch and local community (Beaumont 1994).

  • 1997:

    Explicit Museum Policy

    The Dawson City Museum received (DCM Newsletter vol. 13 no. 2):

    • operation and maintenance funding
    • project funding for:
      • cataloging and registering a backlog of artifacts
      • an exhibition on glacial and geological history of the Klondike mining district
      • upgrading the Klondike Mines railway interpretation
      • research on the history of tourism in Dawson.
    • Conservation assistance for textiles

    The Operational and Maintenance funding formula changed to include a component tied to memberships and fundraising (See documents available in Correspondence director 1997-1998, Box 25, Dawson City Museum Archives).

    Yukon Beringia Interpretive Centre opened

    Tourism / Museum Policy

    The Passport program underwent review (See documents available in Correspondence director 1997-1998, Box 25, Dawson City Museum Archives)

  • 1998:

    Explicit Museum Policy

    The territorial government designed a collection management database for community museums with a master copy at each museum and a copy on the Registration computer in Yukon government (Ball 2004).

  • 1999:

    Explicit Museum Policy

    There were decreases in the Museum support program:

    From 1996-97 to 1999-2000, we’ve got a21-percent decrease in the capital funding to museums. In the historic sites area, from 1996-97 to 1999-2000,we’ve got a 31-percent decrease – we’re talking $881,000 down to $605,000… The museums assistance in 1996-97 was $467,000. The estimate for this year is $314,000. That’s 33-percent down. The interpretive signage was $245,000 in 1996-97 and is $125,000 now. That’s almost a 49-percent decrease.

    YLA 29.1.157

Local

  • 1995:

    The City of Dawson began to provide funding from the Centennial Events Fund to offset costs of summer student wages (DCM Newsletter vol. 12 no. 2)

  • 1997:

    The City of Dawson provided $10, 000 through its Centennial Events Fund to continue offsetting the Museum’s interpretive staff wages (DCM Newsletter vol. 13 no. 2)

  • 1998:

    The City of Dawson continued to provide a grant to the Dawson City Museum to offset summer student wages (Annual General Meeting Director’s Report 1999).

Community Action

Most importantly, the 1990s were a decade of activity related to anniversary celebrations.

  • 1991:

    Museum Community

    The Yukon Historical and Museums Association held an introductory computer workshop, involving the Canadian Heritage Information Network and the Ontario Museum Association’s Trillium project (YHMA 1991)

  • 1998: It was the centennial of the Klondike Gold Rush, leading to an increase in visitors to Dawson City.

  • 1999:

    Museums Community

    The Yukon Museums and Historical Association engaged in consultation to develop a strategic plan (Coop 2000/2001, Winter).

Questions

Do you know of any important milestones that are missing?

Would any of the entries benefit from more information or links to additional resources?

References

Ball, Drew. 2004. Museums Status Report. Blue Binder. Box 33. Dawson City Museum Archives.

Beaumont, Doug. 1994, November 24. Letter to the Dawson City Museum, Sports and lotteries paper. Box 22. Dawson City Museum Archives.

CCI. 1991, March. Newsletter. 7.

CCI. 1990, September. Newsletter. 6.

Copp, Marjorie. 2000/2001. “YHMA Strategic Plan.” Yukon Historical & Museums Association Newsletter. Winter.

Heritage Vancouver. 1998, November. “Mark your Calendar: Ongoing to December 19, 1998 – Klondike Gold.” Heritage Vancouver Newsletter 7(11).

Kelly, Wayne. 1990, November. Security Review. Security Report Museums Assistance Program. Box 16. Dawson City Museum Archives.

McAvity, John. 1995, Summer. “Advocacy Alert: Urgent! Act Now to Stop Cuts.” Newsletter: 5.

Neufeld, David. 1995, Summer. “Life on the River: A Conference in Dawson City.” Newsletter: 6-7.

Swackhammer, Mc. 1995. Letter to the Canada Employment Centre. 95 SEED Challenge. Box 23b. Dawson City Museum Archives.

Swackhammer, Mac. 1996a. Final Report. Summer Students SEED 1996. Box 23. Dawson City Museum Archives.

Swackhammer, Mac. 1996b. Final Report. YCW CMA 1996. Box 23. Dawson City Museum Archives.

YHMA. 1991, January. “Museum News: Dawson Museum.” Newsletter: 1.

YHMA. 1991, May. “Museum News.” Newsletter: 2. 

YHMA. 1991, September. “News Continues: Dawson City Museum.” YHMA September 1991 Newsletter: 4-5. 

YHMA. 1992a, April. “Update on Yukon Museums: Dawson City Museum & Historical Society.” Newsletter.

YHMA. 1992b, December. “News from the Yukon Museums…” Newsletter: 4-5.

YHMA. 1994, Fall. “Canadian Conservation Institute (CCI) Workshops on Artifacts.” YHMA Newsletter: 3. 

YHMA. 1994, December. “Summary: Yukon Museum Activities.” YHMA Newsletter: 5-6.

YHMA. 1996, summer. “Museums Update: Dawson City Museum.” Newsletter. 

Archival Research: Too Much for One Person

After a very intensive week in the Dawson City Museum (DCM) archives, I am sorting, reading, and analyzing what I found. The documents scanned are interesting and contributing to the narrative(s) about the DCM’s development. In order to help with the analysis, the “Archival Research” series considers the stories archival materials tell, looking at the items I found most exciting.  

This post builds on Overwhelming Obstacles, which considers a Board member’s feeling of overwhelm. In that instance, the Dawson City Museum (DCM) did not a full-time, year round Director yet. This post considers three instances where Directors similarly felt overburdened and expressed this feeling in correspondence.

Examples

Instead of contextualizing the examples, I am going to provide the three examples one after the other to show how the problem has existed across time and with different Directors. Here they are:

Document in 7.7.40, Box 5, Dawson City Museum Archive

DCM is recognized as one of the most important heritage attractions in the community yet we have few volunteers, locals rarely attend our special events, and financial support is nil. My fear is that eventually the Museum will not be able to sustain its operations and will close. It will only be then that people will realize our struggle and step up to help.

A Director’s Exit report
Letter from O & M correspondence, Box 29b, Dawson City Museum Archives.

Why are these excerpts interesting?

The excerpts are most interesting because they are part of a trend, showing a pattern of the Museum Director being overwhelmed with the amount of work needed. However, they each highlight specific problems, which are not mutually exclusive and do repeat:

The first letter reflects on the Board’s lack of participation and tendency to expect the Director to do a job the Board should have be doing or hired someone qualified to do. In particular, the Director was working as their secretary. The Director was also working as Financial Clerk, doing the bookkeeping, despite being unqualified for that position. She wrote:

… To spend one year as Financial Clerk and secretary is not my idea of the job position.

See Above

When the Director expressed her concerns, they were not addressed:

I spoke out at our May meeting…I have had to struggle all summer to do a job that I said that I was not really qualified for.

See above

In the second example, the Director talks about the lack of ongoing local support for the institution – that is, outside of a crisis – despite its recognition as a vital attraction:

….we have few volunteers, locals rarely attend our special events, and financial support is nil. My fear is that eventually the Museum will not be able to sustain its operations and will close.

See above

Finally, the last excerpt touches on a lack of financial resources, which led to a lack of support for employment:

My success rate in obtaining grants has been declining recently because of the poor economy and the overwhelming number of deserving applications being submitted to funders of every description. The Museum was extremely close to closing its doors twice during the peak tourist season last summer.

See above

In short, the Museum’s Directors are often left feeling “frustrated, exhausted, enervated, and despondent” (See third letter above) due to a perceived lack of support from the Board, the community and/or potential funders. Running a museum is hard and involves work in administration, collections, exhibitions, facilities management, research, and public programming. This work becomes even harder without support.

Is there broader relevance?

The broader relevance becomes apparent when looking at period(s) where Directors were not reporting feelings of being overwhelmed. In particular, the Museum was relatively well staffed due to the availability of project, employment, and Yukon anniversary funding from the mid 1980s to the late 1990s. During that period, the Museum also had an active and involved board, including people with relevant knowledge working with Parks Canada. As a result, the Museum thrived.

The “Golden Age” of the Museum started with a 2.9 million dollar renovation in the mid 1980s and continued with new exhibitions, active involvement in the community, and an expanded resource center. It ended as funding became scarcer and the board became less active. Without funding for staff and active committees, the workload was left to the director and the few contract employees that depended on grant availability.

The Dawson City Museum has the largest collection of artifacts in Yukon and is a key attraction in a community that relies on tourism. In many ways, the institution punches above its weight. However, as the responsibility for that work falls on fewer shoulders, those people feel overwhelmed. I recommend checking out Paul Thistle’s, a former Director of the Dawson City Museum, blog on task saturation for more information about the scope of work required of museum workers and possible solutions. It is available here.

Questions

What do you think? Are these the same lessons you draw from the excerpts? Do you think it is important to consider Director overload when looking at the Museum’s development?

Archival Research: Overwhelming Obstacles

After a very intensive week in the Dawson City Museum (DCM) archives, I am sorting, reading, and analyzing what I found. The documents scanned are interesting and contributing to the narrative(s) about the DCM’s development. In order to help with the analysis, the “Archival Research” series considers the stories archival materials tell, looking at the items I found most exciting.  

Within this post, I am looking at the Dawson City Museum’s response to a 1968 Fire Marshal’s report, which stated a fire would result in a complete loss of the Museum’s building – the Old Territorial Administration Building (OTAB). I talked about a later fire inspection, labeling the building a “death trap,” in the last Archival Research post – Government Relationships. Not much had changed from 1968 to 1979!

The letter in question is from the Museum Society’s Treasurer to the Commissioner. It is three pages so I won’t post the entire document. Here are some interesting excerpts:

1.1.38 correspondence 1968, Box 1, Dawson City Museum Archives

Why is the letter interesting?

The Museum received the Fire Inspector’s report condemning the Old Territorial Administration Building (OTAB) housing the Museum in August 1968. Importantly, those running the Museum did not believe the OTAB was any more dangerous than it had been when the government used the space. The treasurer argued:

Sure this old building is a fire trap. Has been for as long as I can remember… One thing is certain that it is no more a fire hazard than it was when the government were using it, in fact less.

See letter above

As a result, the inspector’s report was seen as an unreasonable obstacle for an already overburdened group of volunteers running the Museum. After describing the Museum as a team of three people, the treasurer stated:

… it might be a good time to bunch it. Why keep batting ones head against a wall?

See letter above

The letter makes the writer’s frustration clear. The volunteers running the Museum felt overworked and were not getting the support they needed from the community or government. Instead, the government was creating obstacles:

It has now come to the time where the hurdles are too great. Bucking public apathy is hard enough, when government artificials start giving one a bad time this is the last straw. As far as I am concerned, personally the government can shut down the whole operation, I would save myself a lot of work and worry.

see letter above

In response to the letter, the federal government began working with the Museum to find a solution – that is, alternative accommodations. However, it did not work out. By 1970, the Museum offered to sell their assets to National Historic Sites for $1 as they planned to cease operations.

Is there broader relevance?

Clearly, the Museum still exists in the Old Territorial Administration Building (OTAB) so they did not sell the collection or even move.

I also found no evidence that they addressed the fire inspector’s report… it appears to have been forgotten about until the Museum failed another report in 1979 and were prevented from re-opening in 1980 (See Government Relationships for more information).

However, the event is still important because it illustrates a broader point – that is, running a museum is hard and people are often overworked. The few people running the Dawson City Museum in the late 1960s were not getting the support they needed from the community or government to do so effectively. The fire inspector’s report was the final straw, leading to so much frustration that the Museum’s collection was almost consumed by the federal government’s operation in the area.

Importantly, the Dawson City community tends to rally in support of the Museum in times where the institution is threatened. In this instance, a new board was elected and brought an enthusiasm to the Museum’s operations, which enabled it to continue (Snider 1971 1972). As the new Secretary wrote:

We have faced a problem in that some have had a desire to abandon the work rather than improve it. This has started to change now with some changes in our directors.

Snider 1972

Questions

What do you think? Are these the same lessons you draw from the letter? Do you think this is an important event in the development of the Dawson City Museum?

References

Snider, K. C. 1971, January 27. Letter to the NHS Superintendent. 2.2.1: Correspondence. Box 1. Dawson City Museum.

Snider, K.C. 1972, February 21. Letter to the White Valley Historical Society. 2.2.2: Correspondence 1972. Box 1. Dawson City Museum.

Archival Research: Government Relationships

After a very intensive week in the Dawson City Museum (DCM) archives, I am sorting, reading, and analyzing what I found. The documents scanned are interesting and contributing to the narrative(s) about the DCM’s development. In order to help with the analysis, the “Archival Research” series considers the stories archival materials tell, looking at the items I found most exciting.  

Within this post, I am looking at a letter sent to the Dawson City Museum (DCM) Director from the Klondike’s MLA (Member of Legislative Assembly). Here it is (without contact information):

5.5.50 YTG grant etc re : repairing Dawson museum 1980. Box 5. Dawson City Museum Archives.

Why is the letter interesting?

In 1979, the Museum failed a fire inspection. The inspector wrote (in another letter I found fascinating):

To be completely honest, up until the time of the familiarization tour that you guided for the members of the Fire Department, I considered the Museum as a large “fire trap”. However, since the tour, I believe a more accurate term is a large “death trap”. These are dramatic terms, but I believe they are realistic

Rehn 1979, 1

The Museum did not have the funds to fix the “death trap” (otherwise known as the Old Territorial Administration building). Since the territory owned (and still owns) the building, the DCM asked the government to pay for at least some of the upkeep.

The Territory responded with a one-time grant of $14,000.The Minister noted,

the grant demonstrates the territorial government’s continuing commitment to develop Dawson as a major tourist destination point and to upgrade visitor facilities in the community. The museum is a tourist attraction but, more importantly, it also represents a significant part of Yukon’s heritage and culture.

(Senger 1980)

The MLA from Klondike was a member of the party in power and the Minister of Health and Human Resources. She was particularly interested in Yukon history and provided invaluable support internally for the museum to get the grant. She wrote the letter above in response to a thank you letter from the Museum. The letter made a specific reference to the Minister’s responsibilities:

As you must be aware, we were all pleased and somewhat overwhelmed at the generosity of the grant, and hope that every penny can be well spent… especially with respect to the washroom facilities… we don’t want to add to the Health problems of the Yukon if we possibly can!!!!

Museum Director 1981

The letter also thanks the Minister for her specific contribution, discussing its effects:

We understand that your support was invaluable and knowing your own particular interest in Yukon History, I am sure you will know how much more important this grant is to us. It leaves us free to continue planning for the summer, and a feeling of satisfaction that we have support in the Yukon Government for Yukon history.

Museum Director 1981

The Museum did, in fact, have support in the Yukon Government. Following the receipt of this funding, they were able to successfully advocate for a 2.9 million dollar renovation.

Is there broader relevance?

I think the letter shows a friendly attitude toward the Museum and the presence of advocates within government. For example, the Minister notes:

We couldn’t possibly star a tourist season without our museum opening, (with plumbing yet — no more dashes across the road to McDonald Lodge!)

See letter above

The quote demonstrates the Minister’s specific knowledge about the institution, which was not stated in the thank you letter – that is, they used the washrooms at McDonald Lodge. It also positions the Minister and Museum as a team and part of the same community with the use of “we” and “our.”

The friendly attitude and government support the letter demonstrates likely contributed to the support the Museum received in the 1980s. For more on the importance of good government relationships and awareness, check out post “The Importance of a Marvelous Lunch,” also addresses this theme.

Questions

What do you think? Do you think this letter is important in a consideration of the Dawson City Museum’s development? Why or why not?

References 

Museum Director. 1981, January 28. Letter to the Minister. 5.5.50 YTG grant etc re : repairing Dawson museum 1980. Box 5. Dawson City Museum Archives.

Rehn, Rick. 1979, June. Letter to the Museum director. 4a.4.15: Fire inspection 1979, Box 4. Dawson City Museum Archives, Dawson City.

Senger, Dennis. 1980, January 8. “Repair Grant for Dawson Museum.” News Release. 5.5.50 YTG grant etc re : repairing Dawson museum 1980. Box 5. Dawson City Museum Archives. 

Case Study: Dawson City Museum Timeline, 1980s

Last updated: April 13, 2022

CW: Historic, colonialist language is visible in the names of organizations and images used.

As part of the Dawson City Museum Project, I am creating timelines of the Museum’s development in relation to government policy and community action (1950s, 1960s, 1970s, 1980s, 1990s, 2000s, 2010s).

Museum Operations

In the 1970s, the Dawson City Museum began to professionalize due to the first year round director who used federal employment funding to support winter positions. Of particular significance, the Director and other employees began to reorganize materials into displays with a narrative, moving away from a “grandmother’s attic” approach to exhibiting the history of the region. For more information on the 1970’s see the timeline available here.

In the early 1980s, the Director resigned after warning the Museum’s society that they needed to provide more support because she was overworked. Her eventual resignation seemingly provided the impetus needed for the Society to expand and develop. As the Society began offering more support and developing committees, the territory also developed a museum advisor position and signed an agreement with the federal government, leading to funding for tourism related capital projects. As a result, the 1980s was a decade of change for the museum as it became more professional using a broad range of financial and non financial resources available from the federal government, territorial government, and the community itself.

  • 1980:

    The Dawson City Museum (DCM) opened late because they needed approval to open from the Fire Inspector who had asked for renovations. The Museum closed early because they did not have the staff to open holiday weekends (DCM Director’s Annual Report March 4th 1981).

    Letter to the Director from the Fire Inspector. 4a.4.15. Box 4. DCM Files.

    Building

    The Museum worked to meet requirements from the Fire Marshall (DCM Minutes January 21 meeting), using a $14,000 grant from Yukon Government provided for building repairs (DCM Director’s Report for November). They used the special grant to do electric work, plumbing, carpentry and fixing broken windows (DCM Director’s Report for August).

    Collections

    Museum staff worked to better store artifacts:

    • in order to meet Fire Marshall requirements (DCM Minutes January 21 meeting).
    • using funding from the Yukon Tourist Advisory Board to purchase materials to organize the artifacts at Bear Creek (See additional information under staffing and Yukon support; DCM Director’s Annual Report March 4th 1981).

    The Museum received:

    • many donations of archival material and mining equipment.
    • a steppe mammoth tooth (DCM Director’s Annual Report March 4th 1981).

    Exhibitions

    Two pistols were stolen from the Museum’s exhibition and later recovered (DCM Director’s Annual Report March 4th 1981).

    Fundraising / Earned Revenues

    The Museum continued their gift shop services. They:

    • received around 300 license plates from the MacBride Museum and sold them during the summer (DCM Minutes January 21 meeting).
    • sold coloring books (DCM Minutes April 1 meeting).
    • found and sold a box of the Jubilee doll’s (see the DCM 1970s timeline for information; DCM Director’s Report for August)

    The Museum had contracts that helped generate money, such as:

    • a cataloguing contract with Parks Canada. In January they had typed 430 cards and mounted 270 (DCM Minutes January 21 meeting). Additional Parks Canada contracts are described in: DCM Director’s Report for November.
    • a contract to research flood levels from the Water Resources Board (DCM Director’s Annual Report March 4th 1981).

    The Museum doubled its admission fees for adults from $1 to $2 (DCM Director’s Annual Report March 4th 1981).

    Staffing

    The Director noted 1980 was a year of turmoil because she attempted “to cover too many bases at once” and there was a lack of community involvement within the Museum Society (DCM Director’s Annual Report March 4th 1981).

    During the summer:

    • The Museum experienced high staff turnover, starting the season with six staff and ending with only three. Nineteen people turned down a position at the Museum and many cited low wages as the reason (DCM Director’s Annual Report March 4th 1981).
    • A student work grant enabled six students to clean the Bear Creek Warehouse, install metal shelving, and re-box / store artifacts (DCM Director’s Annual Report March 4th 1981). A later report noted that “upwards of 13 persons were hired” (DCM Director’s Report for November).
  • 1981:

    Programming (Other)

    The three year Klondike Heritage Services project began, involving work on the resource centre, education programs, audio-visual materials, registration and collection, photography, displays, and more (DCM Klondike Heritage Services Report).

    improved services to both visitors and the community. This may be realised by upgrading exhibits; developing new exhibits; implementing a đocumentation program through historical research, cataloguing artifacts in the collection, archival organization, and genealogical work re Klondikers; organizing a visitor/community services program through audio-visual programs, travelling exhibit preparation, implementing public access to documentation. On-the-job training will be provided, which will create a nucleus of locally qualified people from which permanent staff may be hired in the near future.

    Jones-Gates 1981, 7

    Staffing

    The Dawson City Museum received a $133,000 “work grant” from the Department of Employment and Immigration’s Canada Community Services Program, which funding the Klondike Heritage Services Project (DCM Director’s Annual Report March 4th 1981).

    The Museum’s Director noted she may resign, pointing to a lack of support for the job (DCM Director’s Annual Report March 4th 1981). In particular, the Director had to engage in bookkeeping and treasurer work for which she was not trained (See, for example, documents available in Klondike heritage services programs final report January 1982, Box 5, Dawson City Museum Archives).

  • 1982:

    Building

    The Old Territorial Building received funding through the Canada-Yukon Tourism Agreement for the foundation and fencing for the locomotives (Yukon 1983; DCM AGM President’s Report November 26 1982).

    Klondike Mines Railway Locomotive No. 1, 1963 (Artist: Harold Dines; DCM Archives 2013.1.21.24)

    Collections

    The Museum established a collections committee and engaged in collections work as described under staffing (DCM Klondike Heritage Services Report).

    Earned Revenues / Fundraising

    The Museum had to approve a deficit budget due to financial concerns, which lead to energies being redirected to local fundraising, contracts, and so on.

    Exhibitions

    With the help of volunteers, the Museum improved the south gallery with a newspaper office, second hand store, and a fire display. The north wing was reorganized to include an audio visuals room (DCM Klondike Heritage Services Report).

    The Council chambers / Courtroom was used for the following temporary exhibitions (DCM. Box 5. 7.7.42. Exhibitions, displays, expositions and fairs Gallery 1982):

    • June 7-30:
      • Drawings of the planned building restorations
      • Art display by students, depicting dogs and dog sleds
    • July 1-8: Photo exhibit from the Museum’s collection titled “Kids in Dawson”
    • July 9-August 18: Norther Fibres Guild Exhibit
    • August 19-25: Arts Camp show from the Music Festival’s summer camp.

    Governance

    The DCM began a review of its constitution and bylaws, but stopped due to financial limitations (DCM AGM President’s Report November 26 1982).

    Programming (other)

    The Museum increased its opening hours and expanded its programming to include genealogical research, historic photographic services and film presentations (DCM AGM President’s Report November 26 1982). The film presentations included (DCM. Box 5. 7.7.42. Exhibitions, displays, expositions and fairs Gallery 1982):

    • Land for all Seasons: a slide show on the Dempster Highway
    • The Yukoner: a film on Sourdough Harry Leamon
    • Dawson Film Find: a selection of silent films unearthed in Dawson in 1978
    • City of Gold: Film on Klondike history

    Museum staff and volunteers used their experiences from past Parks Canada contracts to create finding guides for archival material in the resource center. A photographer also worked to copy original prints to better facilitate making prints for display or sale (DCM Klondike Heritage Services Report).

    The Museum put on a workshop with the YHMA, addressing ethics and artifact ownership, collection policies, heritage laws, archaeological methods of gathering and recording information, and cataloguing procedures (DCM Klondike Heritage Services Report).

    Staffing

    The Museum’s director resigned (DCM AGM President’s Report November 26 1982).

    The Museum continued to receive staffing through funding programs, including (DCM Klondike Heritage Services Report):

    • two students hired through a federal grant. They worked in the resource center.
    • a student hired through a federal grant served as a visual arts guide, showing the Dempster highway slide show and movies to visitors. The student also helped with genealogy inquiries.
    • six students were hired to catalogue, photograph, and store artifacts. One of the students was a Conservation student at Queen’s University.

    Staff worked to “train themselves,” using opportunities available outside the Yukon (DCM Klondike Heritage Services Report).

  • 1983:

    Attendance was down 30% (DCM Board minutes July 12 1983).

    Building

    As part of the Canada-Yukon Tourism Agreement the Old Territorial Administration Building received $125,000 for roof reconstruction (YLA 25.3.38).

    Around Christmas time, the Museum also received notification of $200,000 in funding to replace the foundation. As stated in a newsletter from the time:

    The Museum received quite a Christmas present this year. The Department of Renewable Resources, Heritage Branch, made $200,000 available to replace the foundation of the Old Territorial Administration Building which presently houses the Museum. The happy news was due in large part to the efforts of Dale Perry, Bea Firth, and Terry Weninger, and it is to them we offer our heartfelt thanks

    Dawson City Museum and Historical Society 1983, 40

    The funding for the foundation was timely and necessary as a report found that 26% of the foundation posts had failed and 35% had rotten to a unsalvageable level. The Museum expected CYTA funding to repair the foundation but were not considered eligible (Ross 1982).

    The Museum used a CYTA (Canada Yukon Tourism Agreement) grant to put fencing around a train (Dawson City Museum and Historical Society, 1983).

    Collection

    The Museum actively used a hygrothermograph from the CCI to monitor the environment and began checking the UV levels in the building (DCM Board minutes July 12 1983; DCM Board minutes July 26 1983; DCM Minutes May 17 1983).

    The Collections Committee used the new aims and objective to assess a portion of the collection, resulting in de-accessioning work (DCM Board minutes July 12 1983).

    Artifacts were unearthed as part of the work on the Old Territorial Administration Building’s foundation (DCM Minutes February 22 1983).

    Earned revenues / Fundraising

    In Augusts, the Museum cut their hours of operation to save on staff costs because admissions were down (DCM Board minutes August 9 1983).

    The Museum raised money during the Canada Day celebration (DCM Board minutes July 12 1983).

    Exhibitions

    The Museum set up the “Courtenay collection” (DCM Board minutes August 9 1983). There was also a display of art and photography (DCM Minutes May 17 1983).

    A staff member began planning an “Aboriginal Gallery” but the person quit, delaying the project (DCM Board minutes July 26 1983).

    Governance

    Aims and Objectives adopted

    The Constitution continued to undergo revisions (DCM April 5, 1983 Minutes; DCM Board minutes October 4 1983).

    The Museum society engaged in a membership drive (DCM April 19, 1983 Minutes).

    The Board developed active committees with 9 committees providing direction to the Society (Ross 1983).

    Programming (Other)

    The Museum organized a workshop with support from support from the Council for Yukon Indians, the MacBride Museum, the Yukon Lotteries Commission, the YTG Heritage Branch and CP Air. The workshop addressed the importance of documentation in a museum collection (YHMA 1983).

    There was a summer audio-visual program with a slide show and excerpts of a silent movie (Dawson City Museum and Historical Society, 1983).

    The Museum developed 8 class room programs (Ross 1983).

    Staffing

    The Museum entered the third year of the Klondike Heritage Services Project, which involved grants for employees, and received funding under the Winter Works Grant for additional employees. As stated in a newsletter:

    In 1983, we entered our third and final year of the Klondike Heritage Program. Two positions are sponsored by this grant; registration/ cataloguing and historical research. Under the Winter Works Grant there are three positions: photographer, who will begin copying and restoring that part of the museum collection; education officer, who will institute an education program for schools, and librarian, who will continue developing the library and resource centre. As an indication of the success of the resource centre, over 200 inquiries were answered last summer

    Dawson City Museum and Historical Society, 1983

    The Museum continued to hire staff, using a system of grants (Grant 1983):

    • 1983 was the last year of the Klondike Heritage Services Programme, which used a Canada Community Services Project grant to fund a range of positions.
    • the Winters Work Project allowed staff to work in photography, research and educational programming.
    • the Artifact Management Programme provided a registrar, catalogues, and a photographer for the summer of 1983.
    • YTG Special Employment Assistance Program for Yukon Students allowed the museum to hire a genealogy researcher and assistant for the resource center.
    • the Summer Support program provided four students.
  • 1984:

    Building

    The Yukon Territorial Government funded additional plans and activities to restore the Old Territorial Administration Building. The Minister of Economic Development and Tourism explained the support as follows:

    What it is is to do the architectural planning for reconstruction of the inside of the building, and to actually restore the inside of the building back to what is necessary for a museum and also with respect to the old legislative chambers. We have already expended in the neighbourhood of $1.2 million on the building to date. This is probably the final money that will be expended on the building and it will be back in a condition where it is stable and where we can utilize it to full advantage. 

    YLA 25.4.39, 767

    Landscaping work began at the Museum (DCM Meeting minutes May 29, 1984).

    Collections

    The collection contained about 30,000 objects and only a third was catalogued (DCM Collections Committee Report for 1988-9). However, the Museum developed a collections policy and worked to address the uncatalogued items (Thorp 1984).

    Exhibitions

    The Museum opened exhibitions on Moosehide, commissioners, and the Herschel Island (DCM Meeting minutes July 10, 1984).

    Governance

    Statement of Intent, Collections Policy and Personnel Policy adopted.

    Management Plan developed with the assistance of Brenda Berk.

    Staffing

    The Katimavik program provided volunteer support (DCM Meeting minutes January 10, 1984).

    The Museum received a Winter Works grant for three people (DCM Meeting minutes January 10, 1984).

  • 1985:

    Due to financial difficulties, the Museum had a shorter season with less staff. While there was a slight decrease in visitors, there was an increase in the number of local residents visiting the Museum (DCM Directors Report November 15 1985).

    Building

    The Old Territorial Administration Building Restoration continued (YLA 26.2.4)

    Collection

    The Museum engaged in work on the photograph collection. In particular (DCM Directors Report November 15 1985):

    • The collection was organized into categories.
    • A Yukon Lottery Commission grant enabled the Museum to purchase a copy camera.

    The Resource Centre Co-ordinator evaluated the books, magazines and periodicals according to the Museum’s Collections Policy and submitted items to the Collections Committee for Review (DCM Directors Report November 15 1985).

    Exhibitions

    The Museum produced its first traveling exhibition, which used the photography collection. The exhibition was titled “Klondike Youth, a Photographic Display” (DCM Directors Report November 15 1985).

    Following the recommendations from the Management Study, the Museum stopped conducting guided tours of the Museum during the summer. Instead, they increased the signage to provide information on the Klondike and allow visitors to tour the museum at their own pace (DCM Directors Report November 15 1985).

    Committees – Display. 11.11.33. Box 9. DCM.

    The Museum opened the IODE, YOOP, Klondike Mines Railway, and Percy DeWolfe exhibits. The Visitor Reception Centre also hosted a small promotional exhibit from the Museum (DCM Directors Report November 15 1985).

    Fundraising / Earned Revenues

    The Dawson City Museum developed a cafe:

    …the request for the installation of a cafe was requested by the Dawson Museum Society, and it was in response to a number of representations made by the public and, for the most part, included tourists visiting Dawson City and visiting the museum itself. My understanding as to the intention as to the management of the cafe is that it will be leased out to a local Dawson business. They expect significant operating revenues from the operation of the cafe

    YLA 26.2.12, 229

    The Museum developed a manual for the gift shop (DCM Directors Report November 15 1985).

    Governance

    The Board now had the following committees: finance, display, collections, membership, fundraising, newsletter, executive, and liaison for the OTAB renovations (DCM AGM Minutes November 15 1985).

    Programming (Other)

    The Museum’s Porter Engine 4 was installed at Expo ‘86’s pavilion entrance (YHMA 1986).

    The Museum completed a walking tour book of Dawson, which was written as part of a past contract with Parks Canada (DCM Directors Report November 15 1985).

    The Resource Center was a popular resource (DCM Directors Report November 15 1985).

    Staffing

    The Museum had to reduce the number of staff hired due to financial difficulties (DCM Directors Report November 15 1985).

    The Museum continued to use grant programs to fund employment (DCM Directors Report November 15 1985):

    • A federal Manpower grant enabled the Museum to hire 4 people for 21 weeks to organize the photograph collection.
    • A summer student grant enabled the Museum to hire 6 students: 3 full time and 1 part time guide / security staff, a gift shop manager, and an archivist/resource centre coordinator.

    The Director did a short term study tour of archives and museums in Ontario, spending 10 days at the Public Archives of Canada. She also attended the Heritage North Conference and a YHMA conference (DCM Directors Report November 15 1985).

  • 1986:

    The Dawson City Museum (DCM) closed to visitors for renovations (DCM Presidents Report November 15 1985). However, they opened in the summer in the B.Y.N (British Yukon Navigation) Ticket Office thanks to an agreement with Parks Canada (DCM Newsletter Vol. 4 No. 2)

  • 1987:

    Building

    The YTG continued to fund the Old Territorial Administration Building renovations (YLA 26.3.72). In particular, they provided funding to make a train shelter to protect a newly restored engine and other trains (DCM Acting Director’s Report).

    Collections

    As part of YTG funding for major artifact stabilization, the Dawson City Museum receives funding for three trains (YLA 26.3.6)

    Exhibits

    The DCM received $50,000 from the YTG for a major exhibit development project (YLA 26.3.7). The Museum planned “Kings of the Klondike” for the South Gallery, which was also called the “big black box” (DCM Acting Director’s Report).

    The Museum opened a community quilt display. They produced a catalogue for the exhibit, which was the first one produced by a Yukon museum (Crook 1987).

    Carpenters (See LEOP employment under staffing) made desks, tables, benches and display cases throughout the Museum (DCM Acting Director’s Report).

    The Museum held the first Multi Artist, Multi Media Art Show in Dawson – in recent memory (DCM 1988).

    Programming (Other)

    The Museum published “Heirlooms – a collection of Theme Quilts handcrafted by the Community of Dawson City” with support from YTG, YLC, Canada Council and volunteers (DCM Acting Director’s Report). See exhibitions for more information.

    Staffing

    The DCM continued to use employment programs to fund staff (DCM January 5 1987 Minutes), including:

    • The Local Employment Opportunities Program (LEOP) provided funding for three carpenters (DCM Acting Director’s Report).
    • The Canada Yukon Job Development Program provided funding for a retail clerk, two researchers, and an administrative assistant (DCM Acting Director’s Report).
  • 1988:

    Building

    Milne House and Bear Creek – Artifact Storage

    The CCI found these locations inadequate for artifact storage (DCM Collections Committee Report for 1988-9).

    Old Territorial Administration Building

    There were problems with leaks, such as a leak due to snow that damaged an original print and negatives. The landlord (Yukon Territorial Government) noted they would monitor the leaks (DCM Acting Director’s Report March 1988). Additional problems developed, prompting and “OTAB in Crisis” meeting (See documents available in Correspondence regarding restored building, box 16b, DCM Archives).

    Exhibitions

    The Museum opened a new exhibition in the South Gallery and began planning for a revived North Gallery (DCM Display, Finance and Membership Reports).

    The Museum held the second annual multi-media, multi-artist art show in the courtroom (DCM Newsletter Vol 7 No 2).

    Programming (Other)

    The Museum held the following events:

    • April: AGM
    • May 31: Grand Opening of the Museum and New Gallery
    • August – September: Second annual Yukon Expressions Art Show
    • October 1988: Venetian Carnival Mask Slide Show
    • December:
      • Open House and Charity Coffee House Concert
      • Christmas Film Night

    Staffing

    The Director / Curator attended a museum management course in Banff, which was funded through the Canada / Yukon Small Business Training Program and Lotteries Yukon. Lotteries also funded a staff persons at the Museum (YHMA 1989, January; DCM Director’s year end report Aril 28 1989). 

    The Museum continued to use short term grants for employees, including:

    • federal grants for student summer employment, such as Challenge ’88 (DCM Director’s year end report Aril 28 1989).
    • a Canadian Council of Archives grant for archival work (DCM Director’s report July 4, 1988).
  • 1989:

    Collections

    The Museum received funding from Yukon’s Community Development Fund to produce a photographic finding aid (YHMA 1989, September).

    During February and March, the Museum used funding from the YTG Heritage Branch to catalogue the objects in the North and South Galleries. There were plans to do a Bear Creek inventory as well (DCM Collections Committee Report for 1988-9).

    The Museum received a grant to work on the “Artifact Inventory Backlog Project” (Baggaley 1989).

    Exhibitions

    The Museum held a multi-media, multi-artist art show in the courtroom (DCM Newsletter Vol 7 No 2).

    Fundraising / Earned Revenues

    The Museum received funding from the Yukon Foundation to produce a notepaper that depicted Indigenous cultures (YHMA 1989, September).

    Governance

    The Museum’s Society developed Continuing to Grow – a five year master plan.

    Programming (Other)

    The Museum held the following events:

    • February: Heritage Day Open House
    • March: Volunteer / Staff appreciation night
    • April: AGM
    • Science Institute lectures throughout the year

    Staffing

    The Collections Committee argued a lack of continuity in staffing was a barrier to conserving and cataloguing the collection appropriately. In other words, short term staffing allowed projects to take place but the funding programs and their short term nature contributed to discrepancies in the work completed (DCM Collections Committee Report for 1988-9).

    The Museum continued to use short term grants to fund employment, including:

    • a grant from Lotteries Yukon for an office position (DCM Newsletter Vol 7 No 3)

    There is evidence summer staff were struggling to find accommodation:

    The Museum is desperately seeking accommodation (room and board, or private accommodation) for two students this summer.

    DCM Newsletter Vol 7 No 4

Government Policy

First Nation

The Lord Report (1986) contains an overview of (what was called) the Dawson Band. During the 1980s, major concerns included:

  • the loss of the Han language
  • city regulations about the facade of buildings, which did not consider Indigenous architecture and contributions
  • the lack of acknowledgement of Indigenous contributions to the Gold Rush period in Parks Canada interpretations
  • Moosehide’s lack of preservation

The following quote summarizes the relationship between the Band and heritage professionals in Dawson at that time:

Although the Dawson City Museum gives the Band copies of photographs of Moosehide, there has been relatively little contact recently. It is striking to observe the valiant efforts of a small population of Band members (about 200 in all) to preserve a culture that is anthropologically of considerable significance, without assistance from the large number of heritage professionals in Dawson, where scrupulous care is taken to preserve non-native history since 1896. The implicit question of priorities is one to which a museum policy might give some attention.

Lord Report, 58
  • 1982: The Council of Yukon Indians (CYI) asked the government not to table a Green Paper on heritage policy (McCall 1982).

    A CYI representative presented a paper at a the Yukon Historical and Museums Association workshop on heritage policy (see community below). The paper outlined the shortfalls in Yukon heritage management and the participation CYI seeks for the future. He noted there was / were:

    • a lack of appreciation of the relationships between cultural resources and the contemporary. 
    • a lack of Indian managerial museum involvement, local museum expertise and proper facilities
    • bias in education system
    • inter jurisdictional issues

    As such, the CYI asked that Indigenous cultures and traditions be:

    interpreted by Indian people – for Indian people

    Porter 1982, 25
  • 1984: A new “Indian Band Building” opened in Dawson City (DCM Meeting minutes May 29, 1984)

Federal

The Lord Report includes a chart showing Museums Assistance Program grants to Yukon museums from 1972 – 1986:

Chart from Page 11 of the Lord Report
  • 1980:

    Canadian Conservation Institute (CCI)

    The CCI introduced a mobile conservation service with six mobile labs traveling to all regions of Canada, which had started as a pilot program in 1979 (McCawley and Ward 1980).

    • One of the labs visited the DCM in August 1980, providing a report that outlined security problems and deficiencies in the protection of the collection (DCM Director’s Annual Report March 4th 1981).
  • 1981:

    Canadian Conservation Institute (CCI)

    The Canadian Conservation Institute’s mobile conservation laboratory service came to Yukon. The Museums Assistance Program also had a conservation assistance and upgrading equipment assistance available (YHMA 1981b).

    General / Other

    There was a 39.6 million dollar, Department of Communications fund, supported through lottery revenues, to assist arts and culture programs over 3 years. There was a “Capital Assistance to Custodial Cultural Institutions” component (YHMA 1981a).

    Parks Canada

    Relationships with Parks Canada employees enabled training for DCM employees. For example:

    [Employee name] has also been hired to assist with cataloguing. She is currently receiving three months training by … [the] Curator of Collections for Klondike National Historic Sites. In a cooperative venture, KNHS will provide [the employee] with on-the-job training in exchange for her “free” labor to that organization for this three month period.

    Jones-Gates 1981, 8

  • 1982:

    Employment Policy

    Manpower grants continue to be valuable to the Museum (DCM AGM President’s Report November 26 1982).

    National Museums Corporation (NMC)

    National Museums Corporation employees also provided assistance to Yukon museums. For example, they were resourse people for a Yukon Historical and Museums Association workshop (McCormack 1982c).

    Parks Canada

    Parks Canada support was described as integral to the DCM’s operations (DCM AGM President’s Report November 26 1982). The support included:

    • Contracts, such as a contract for cataloguing services
    • Resources to create engineering and architectural studies as well as the designs for the Old Territorial Administration building
  • 1984:

    National Museums Canada (NMC)

    The NMC provided funding for a planning study related to proposed renovations (Dorais 1984). They also commented on the Dawson City Museum’s plans for the Old Territorial Administration Building, asking that an elevator be installed (DMC Meeting minutes July 10, 1984).

  • 1985:

    Canadian Conservation Institute (CCI)

    The Canadian Conservation Institute did a collections survey of five Yukon museums (Lord Report).

    Parks Canada

    Parks Canada staff served on the Dawson City Museum board and committees (DCM Presidents Report November 15 1985).

  • 1986:

    General / Other

    A Study Team Report to the Task Force on Program Review (Nielsen Report) – stated artifacts from the Yukon have been replaced and should be returned to the Yukon (YLA 26.3.72).

    Parks Canada

    Parks Canada assisted the Museum as it closed for renovations, providing exhibition space during the summer and artifact storage (See correspondence available in: 11.11.34 committees – display, correspondence 1985 86, Box 11, Dawson City Museum Archives).

  • 1987:

    Canadian Conservation Institute (CCI)

    The CCI presented “Seminar and Collections Survey for Museums and Galleries in the Yukon” in Dawson City and Whitehorse (CCI 1987, December).

    National Museums Corporation (NMC)

    The NMC’s mobile exhibits visited the Yukon (Crook 1987).

  • 1988:

    Canadian Conservation Institute (CCI)

    The CCI presented “Construction of Mannequins for Historic Costumes in Whitehorse, Yukon (CCI 1989, Spring / Summer).

    The CCI published Survey of Collections in Yukon Museums, March 1988

  • 1989:

    Canadian Conservation Institute (CCI)

    A member of the CCI’s extension services attended a Yukon Historical and Museums Association annual meeting, presenting on the available services (CCI 1990, Autumn / Winter).

    The CCI offered the following services (Communications Canada 1989):

    • Emergency Services: Responded to all requests in emergency / disaster situations across Canada.
    • Professional Field Activities: Provided on-site technical and professional assistance.
    • Technical Advice: Answered questions or provided advice that did not require laboratory treatment or research.
    • Treatment Services: Undertook conservation treatment projects for Canadian Institutions.
    • Access to Laboratories and Equipment: Allowed access in certain situations.
    • Conservation Research
    • Scientific Analysis and Treatment: Made equipment and personnel available to answer specific problems.
    • Extension services:
      • seminars
      • workshops
      • professional conferences and symposia
      • publications
      • internships
      • fellowships
      • tours of CCI laboratories
      • training resources
      • library services

Canada – Yukon

During the 1980s, museums receive support through the Canada-Yukon Subagreement on Tourism.

Importantly, as the territorial museum program developed, Yukon received more support through the federal museum policy. As the Lord Report observes:

Federal funding and technical assistance programmes have only begun to benefit the Territory’s museums significantly in recent years, especially since the appointment of a YTG Museums Advisor.

Lord Report, Vi
  • 1980:

    Tourism Policy

    The first Canada – Yukon Subagreement on Tourism was signed in February. The purpose of the agreement was to undertake programs and projects immediately identified as integral to long term tourism development. The second was to undertake planning activities. The agreement involved a combined investment of 6 million with a YTG investment of 15% or up to $900,000 (source). It led to support for the DCM, including (DCM President’s Report AGM 1980):

    • funding to install fences around the old locomotives
    • a commitment to repair the Museum’s foundations
  • 1981:

    Explicit Museum Policy

    The Director of the Territorial Tourism Planning & Development Branch met with the National Museums regarding possible funding for the Dawson City Museum’s planned work on the Old Territorial Administration Building (Graham 1981, June).

  • 1982:

    Explicit Museum Policy

    The Yukon Museums and Historical Association noted the development of a heritage branch within the Yukon Territorial Government was beneficial to museums because it would enable better access to cost-sharing federal programs (YHMA 1982).

  • 1983:

    Explicit Museum Policy

    The territorial archives and Heritage Branch worked with the Yukon Historical and Museums Association to provide conservation workshops with members of the Canadian Conservation Institute (YHMA 1983b).

    The territorial Museums Advisor worked to improve working relationships with the National Museums of Canada’s Museums Assistance program, touring Yukon museums with the MAP advisor and meeting with the MAP director in Dawson (DCM 1984 Annual General Meeting Minutes).

  • 1985:

    Tourism Policy

    There was a new Canada -Yukon Tourism Agreement that aimed to increase tourist expenditure, reduce seasonal fluctuations, and generate more jobs with tourism industry support, market development, and product development (Lord Report).

  • 1987:

    Explicit Museum Policy

    Museum Assistance Program funding in 1986/1987 allowed the Yukon Heritage Branch to purchase conservation monitoring equipment for museums and an upright freezer (Heritage Branch 1988).

  • 1988:

    Explicit Museum Policy

    The Federal Department of Energy, Mines and Resources provided funding (58,000) to the Heritage Branch to assess and promote a “cold storage” mode for humidity protection being developed by Yukon museums (Heritage Branch 1988).

    The National Museums Corporation’s Conservation Assistance Program enabled YTG to hire a conservator through a shared funding program (Ibid.).

    After the Canadian Conservation Institute terminated a mobile lab program, Yukon received a transfer of a mobile van (Ibid.).

  • 1989:

    Explicit Museum Policy

    The Yukon Heritage Branch organized a seminar with the Canadian Conservation Institute at the MacBride Museum (YHMA 1989).

    The Museum Advisor worked with an individual from the federal Museum Assistance Program to develop a Registration Assistance Program application (Aczel 1989).

Territorial

The 1986 Lord Report provides a wonderful chart of territorial support to community museums in the 1980s:

Chart from page 26 of the Lord report, showing grant amounts
Chart from page 26 of the Lord report, showing grant amounts

Importantly, the 1980s saw the growth and development of an explicit museum policy. However that policy continued to exist within a broader tourism strategy. As the Lord report observes:

From the beginning, Yukon’s museums have experienced an inherent contradiction in their sense of mission: conceived by groups representative of their communities as a means of preserving and interpreting Yukon’s heritage, they have been perceived by other members of their communities as tourist attractions. This impression has been strengthened by their season operation, and their public programming oriented until recently almost exclusively toward summer visitors. Most of the Territorial contribution to their funding before 1982 came from the Department of Tourism, and indeed Heritage Branch is still found within that Department.

Lord Report, 113
  • 1980:

    Tourism Policy

    Museums continued to receive funding as tourism organizations, including an operating grant (total = $20,000, YLA 24.3.10) and the Tourism Attraction Contribution (total = $30,000, YLA 24.3.21).

    Funding from theYukon Tourist Advisory Board for $11,870 allowed the DCM to purchase metal shelving and other materials for the collection project described above (DCM Director’s Annual Report March 4th 1981).

    Explicit Museum Policy

    The Minister of Tourism notes there would probably be a discussion paper on museum policy in the near future and legislation presented by Fall 1981 (YLA 24.3.24)

  • 1981:

    Explicit Museum Policy

    The Ministers responsible for Tourism and Economic Development as well as Education and Information met with the Yukon Historical and Museums Association about the Kyte Report (see community below). They were reviewing the report to develop a reply in April (YLA 24.4.19).

    Responsibility for museums was transferred to the Department of Library and Information Resources (YLA.24.4.19).

    The Department of Library and Information Services became the Department of Heritage and Cultural Resources because:

    Museums were really under Tourism, if anything, and historic sites were under Renewable Resources. Archeological permits were under Consumer and Corporate Affairs. What we have done is to draw all these threads together and make a proper department of Heritage, within the Library and Archives Department. The total Department is now called Heritage and Cultural Resources

    YLA 24.4.20 389

    The new department planned to develop a better formula for museum funding in consultation with museums. There are also plans to meet with the museums association (YLA 24.4.20).

  • 1982:

    Explicit Museum Policy

    The government’s response to the Kyte Report was delayed because they waited to act until they had a Director of the new Heritage Branch (YLA 24.5.4). The Yukon Historical and Museums Association participated in the selection of the Director (McCormack 1982b).

    The Department of Tourism, Heritage and Cultural Resources is formed because heritage resources “have an intrinsic value” and “also are very important to the tourism industry” (261). A survey that showed 29% of Canadian tourism spending was spent by tourists whose main activity was visiting historical and cultural sites (YLA 25.2.14).

    Museums received operational and maintenance funding as museums instead of one type of tourist attraction (YLA 25.2.23).

    The YTG Heritage Branch provided funding to museum training through the Yukon Historical and Museums Association (YHMA 1982b).

    A Green Paper on Heritage Policy was discussed at a YHMA workshop (see community below), but the Council of Yukon Indians asked the government not to table the paper (McCall 1982).

    Heritage Branch staff met with the Dawson City Museum board of directors, providing information on funding available (DCM Minutes December 7 1982).

    Employment / Economic Policy

    The Government implemented a:

    Yukon wide employment stimulation program to assist Yukoners in obtaining employment over the winter months. The projects have been identified for this program on a community-by-community basis and are designed to provide maximum employment opportunities and to develop or upgrade community facilities which will be of a lasting benefit to the community

    Yukon 1983, 2.

    The program – the Local Employment Opportunities Program (LEOP) – was a Yukon Department of Community and Transportation Services program for short term jobs during the winter. Organizations within Dawson City more broadly benefited from this program:

    I would also like to bring to your attention the fact that there are a number of LEOP projects ongoing in my community at this time, which are basically fulfilling the same function. The Dawson Indian Band is doing restoration work on the old school house and cabins at Moosehide; the Dawson City Museum and Historical Society is constructing furniture, $64,000 in the Old Territorial Administration Building; Dawson Child Care Association is retrofitting and renovating the interior of its daycare centre for $31,000; Klondike Visitors Association is spending $50,000 for construction of an interpretive centre, the Jack London exhibit; Yukon Order of Pioneers have $60,000 to do foundation work, repairs and addition to the Pioneer Hall

    YLA 26.3.79

    Yukon Lottery Commission (YLC)

    The YLC provided a $1,000 for the Dawson City Museum to buy a microfilm reader.

  • 1983:

    Employment / Economic Policy

    The Minister of Tourism, Heritage and Cultural Resources applauded the jobs made available through the Yukon Tourism Agreement and Employment Development Fund supported by volunteers in the private sector, such as those with the Dawson City Museum (YLA 25.3.3).

    Explicit Museum Policy

    There was an ongoing plan to – possibly – develop a policy paper on museum policy (YLA 25.3.21).

    The Heritage Branch provided both museum grants and technical assistance to museums. In particular:

    • Grants: They distributed $60,000 in operating and maintenance costs and capital grants to six museums (this is later identified as a typographical error and in documents it says seven). They noted that $30,000 would again be provided for O&M. The capital was also 30,000.
    • Technical assistance: They allocated work hours to recruit a museums advisor, which was a need identified in the Kyte (1980) report. The Minister argued:

    This position will be of great benefit to all local museums by assisting them in developing improved displays, artifact care and staff training. 

    YLA 25.3.21

    In September, the Department of Tourism, Heritage and Cultural Resources released Preserving our Past: Policy Recommendations for the Protection and Management of Yukon’s Heritage Resources. The paper defined heritage value. For example:

    Nowhere is this economic importance more evident than in Yukon, where heritage development and interpretation contributes many millions of dollars to the Yukon economy. Dawson City is but one example

    Tourism, Heritage, and Cultural Resources 1983, 1

    There was a grant for capital projects and the purchase of museum artifacts:

    This $45,000 allows funds for capital projects and for the purchase of museum artifacts. It says that right in the description of the line item. It is also for start-up or reopening of museum

    YLA 25.3.34, 586
  • 1984:

    Explicit Museum Policy

    The Department responsible for museums became the Department of Economic Development and Tourism (YLA 25.4.39).

    The first territorial Museum Advisor was hired.

    There was a (new?) grant for conservation:

    This is to provide specialized funds for local museums to purchase conservation and artifact security equipment, for example, and do environmental monitoring, and fumigation chambers, and things such as that. It is just a small portion for the benefit of the museums.

    YLA 25.4.41, 795

    Tourism Policy

    The Department of tourism sponsored a $500,000 Tourism Incentives Programme. According to the Lord Report, just under 20% of the program went to Heritage. This included a $4, 920 grant to the Dawson City Museum for “planning.”

    Other Policy

    The Yukon Lottery Commission provided project grants to non-profit sports, recreation and arts organizations. As noted in the Lord Report, support to heritage was negligible until 1984-1985.

    Chart from page 52 of the Lord Report
  • 1985:

    Explicit Museum Policy

    The Department responsible for museums became the Department of Tourism (YLA 26.2.4).

    The Heritage Branch budget increased in two ways of relevance to community museums:

    • Advisory support:

    With a recoverable grant from National Museums of Canada we will be able to produce an operational handbook and to obtain additional reference technical materials which will be available and of assistance to all Yukon museums.

    YLA 26.2.7, 124
    • Grant funding:
      • continued operations and maintenance funding.
      • almost 50% of the cost for a Director position.
      • a matching grant for training and travel.

    We have also initiated a new Curator Director Assistants Program in the form of matching grants to our two largest museums, Dawson and McBride [sic]. This is to assist them in their efforts to become increasingly professional and successful. Tourism development has been strengthened through permanent staffing of two positions previously occupied by casual employees funded from capital program funds. It should be noted that these two additions do not represent any net increase in government expenditure. The change has been made out Of fairness to the employees concerned to provide a more realistic and more accurate picture of the expenditures to the Assembly and to provide some additional support and stability in the section which is so critical to long term planning and development of the industry

    YLA 26.2.7, 124

    The Dawson City Museum’s MLA – Art Webster – was an advocate for the Museum with colleague’s, playing an integral role in securing funding for the Museum’s renovations (DCM Presidents Report November 15 1985).

    Yukon Lottery Commission (YLC)

    Museums continued to be eligible for grants from the YLC. For example, a YLC grant enabled the Dawson City Museum to purchase a copy camera (DCM Directors Report November 15 1985).

  • 1986:

    Other Policy

    Yukon 2000 a consultation process about Yukon’s future began. It led to various discussion papers and reports of relevance:

    • Yukon Tourism Strategy: Discussion Paper
    • The Things that Matter: A Report of Yukoners’ views on the Future of their Economy and their Society (available here)
  • 1987:

    Explicit Museum Policy

    There were museum grants for:

    • Major artifact stabilization ($50,000)
    • Exhibit case construction ($50,000)
    • Major Exhibit Development ($175,000)
    • Conservation Security ($150,000)
      • The Lord report indicates this grant matches a Museums Assistance Program grant.
    • Major Museums Development ($175,000)

    The Heritage Branch received funding from the National Museums Corporation to hire a conservator for one year (YHMA 1987).

    Yukon Museums Policy and Systems Plan (also known as the Lord Report) circulated to museums.

  • 1988:

    Other Policy

    Yukon 2000 led to the following initiatives (YLA 26.5.1):

    • Community Development Fund (CDF)
    • Business Development Fund
    • Yukon Conservation Strategy
    • Yukon Tourism Action Plan
    • Yukon Economic Strategy: Yukon 2020 Building the Future (available here)

    Explicit Museum Policy

    There were consultations on a museum policy, using the Lord Report, with community museum boards, the Council of Yukon First Nations, and the Yukon Historical and Museums Association.

  • 1989:

    Explicit Museum Policy

    Museum financial support included (YLA 27.1.15):

    • Major Exhibit Development
    • Museum Capital Contributions
    • Major museum development
    • Artifact Inventory / Catalogue
    • Conservation / Security

    Museums Policy (accessible here)

    The Heritage Branch commissioned the Computerized Needs Assessment for Yukon Museums (Porter 1989).

    The Museum Advisor circulated a draft Artifact Conservation and Security Policy for discussion (Meehan 1989)

Local

The 1986 Lord Report observes that the municipality of Dawson City did not financially support the Museum and, in particular, does not provide support from the Recreation subsidy received from Yukon government.

Community Action

  • 1980:

    Museum Community

    The Yukon Historical and Museums Association commissioned a profile on museums in Yukon with funding from the federal Museums Assistance Program and Yukon Territorial Government. The report recommends:

    • A territorial policy and museum program;
    • A training program;
    • An advisory service;
    • A heritage resource center for training, conservation workshops, and an environmentally controlled space;
    • A review of existing organization; and
    • Encouragement for First Nations to attend training and participate in museums (Kate 1980).

    The report also found:

    Few Canadian Community Museums are as closely tied to the Tourist Industry as those located in Yukon. With visitors to the area outnumbering residents by, at least, ten to one, museum activities are chiefly tourist motivated, frequently at the expense of other museum responsibilities. Of the nearly 300,000 visitors entering Yukon annually it can be reliably assessed that up to 25% spend some time in one or more of the community museums during their travels. Though accurate attendance figures are generally unavailable there is supporting evidence that Whitehorse, Burwash, and Dawson are the principal points of museum contact in the Territory. During 1979 an aggregate total in excess of 50,000 visitors is estimated to have entered these three institutions.

    Kyte 1980, 4
  • 1981:

    Museum Community

    The Yukon Historical and Museums Association engage in advocacy with the Minister of Renewable Resources as well as the Minister of Information Resources and Education (McCormak 1981).

  • 1982:

    Museum Community

    The YHMA was not pleased at the lack of consultation and development of a territorial museum policy. The president noted:

    YHMA has been consulted with only marginally, informally, and after-the- fact, and not in such a way that we could bring these changes to the attention of the public. Essentially, we are being presented with a fait accompli, a set of significant changes which should have been outlined and justified in a long-promised and long-awaited working paper on heritage policy.

    McCormack 1982a, 9

    The YHMA held a workshop on a territorial heritage policy, noting three events led to the workshop:

    • Johnson’s “A Future for the Past,” which provided the basis for a similar workshop in 1980 – I have not accessed this document in full yet. If you have a copy, let me know!
    • Kyte report (1980)
    • YTG reorganization
  • 1983:

    Dawson Community

    There was a Music Fest and the Museum participated with a pancake breakfast (DCM Board minutes July 12 1983).

    Museum Community

    The BC Museums Association circulated a report, which helped the Dawson City Museum create accession and de-accession forms (DCM Minutes May 3, 1983).

  • 1984:

    Museum Community

    The YHMA made a submission to the Government about proposed heritage legislation. They argued the tourism function of heritage is important but:

    the heritage of a people is primarily a cultural business and we attempt to preserve, record and restore evidence of the past mainly that we should know who we are and what we are doing.

    YHMA 1984, 4

    As such, they called for the development of a museum policy addressing collection management, staff training and exhibition development.

  • 1989:

    Museum Community

    The Yukon Historical and Museums Association commissioned the Yukon Museums Marketing Plan

Questions

Do you know of any important milestones that are missing?

Would any of the entries benefit from more information or links to additional resources?

References

Aczel, Luby. 1989, December 4. Letter to the Museums Advisor. Correspondence Museum Assistance Program 1989. Box 15. Dawson City Museum Archive.

Baggaley, Valerie. 1989, February. Letter. Correspondence Director. Box 14. Dawson City Museum Archives.

CCI. 1990. Newsletter. Autumn / Winter.

CCI. 1989. Newsletter. Spring / Summer.

CCI. 1987. Newsletter. December.

Communications Canada. 1989. CCI Services. Canada.

Crook, Peg (Ed.). 1987. Newsletter. April. Yukon Historical and Museums Association. 

Dawson City Museum and Historical Society. 1983. “Dawson Museum News.” Newsletter, 13: 39-41.

Dawson City Museum. 1988. “Welcome to the Second Annual “Yukon Expressions.””Exhibits Art Show. Box 14. Dawson City Museum Archives.

Dorais, Leo. Letter to the Director of the Dawson Museum. 1984-85 MAP terms of reference. Box 7. Dawson City Museum Archives.

Graham, Russell D. 1981, June. Memo 3720-3-12. 6.6.1 OTAB 1979 to 1981. Box 5. Dawson City Museum Archives.

Grant, Christine. “Director’s Report.” 1982-1983 Reports. Native exhibit 1984 proposal to foundations. Box 8. Dawson City Museum Archives.

Heritage Branch. Tourism. Yukon. 1988. “ From the Heritage Branch.” Newsletter 1988 – 3. Yukon Historical and Museums Association. 

Jones-Gates, Kathy. 1981. “Museums update: Dawson City Museum.” YHMANewsletter. 7: 7-8.

Kyte, John E. 1980, November. Museums in Yukon: A Profile and Training Report. Prepared for Yukon Historical and Museums Association. 

McCall, Meg. 1982. “Address to the Workshop Delegates.”  Newsletter, 11: 33-34. 

McCawley, J.C. and Ward, P.R. 1980. “Regional Services: “helping museums help themselves.”” CCI: The Journal of the Canadian Conservation Institute. 4: 14-19.

McCormak, Pat. 1981. “YHMA at Work.” Newsletter, 8: 1-3.

McCormack, Pat. 1982a. “President’s Report.” Newsletter, 10: 6 – 10.

McCormack, Pat. 1982b. “Minutes: Spring General Meeting.” Newsletter, 11: 2-4. 

McCormack, Pat. 1982c. “Museums Update.” Newsletter, 10: 17 – 19.

Meehan, Joanne. 1989, October 26. Letter to the Museums Advisor. Museums Policy. Box 15. Dawson City Museum Archives.

Porter, Dave. 1982. “Presentation: CYI Discussion Paper.” Newsletter, 11: 22 – 27. 

Porter, David. 1989, February. Letter to the Dawson City Museum. Correspondence Director. Box 14. Dawson City Museum Archives.

Ross, Brian. 1982, September. Letter to the Deputy Minister of Tourism, Heritage and Cultural Affairs. 7.7.10; grants 1981 1982. Box 5. Dawson City Museum Archives.

Ross, Brian. 1983. President’s / Executive Committee Report. 982-1983 Reports. Native exhibit 1984 proposal to foundations. Box 8. Dawson City Museum Archives.

Thorp, Valerie. 1984. Collections Committee. Collections Committee 1984. Box 8. Dawson City Museum Archives.

Tourism, Heritage, and Cultural Resources. 1983, September. Preserving our Past: Policy Recommendations for the Protection and Management of Yukon’s Heritage Resources. Government of Yukon. 

YHMA. 1981a. “Museums Update.” Newsletter, 8: 8.

YHMA. 1981b. “Notices.” Newsletter, 8: 21-22.

YHMA. 1982a. “YTG Heritage Branch.” Newsletter, 10: 21. 

YHMA. 1982b. “YHMA at Work.” Newsletter, 11: 1-2. 

YHMA. 1983a. “AGM 1982.” Newsletter, 12: 1.

YHMA. 1983b. “Notices.” Newsletter, 12: 52-53.

YHMA. 1986. March, 1986. Yukon Historical & Museums Association Newsletter.

YHMA. 1987, July.  Yukon Historical & Museums Ass. Newsletter.

YHMA. 1989, January. Newsletter.

YHMA. 1989, September. YHMA Newsletter. 

Yukon Historical and Museums Association. 1984. A Submission to the Government of Yukon Concerning the Proposed New Heritage Legislation. 

Yukon. 1983. Annual Report 1982-1983. 

Reflection: A Week at the Dawson City Museum

As some of you may know (and I have documented on @museoception), I am in Dawson City working on the Dawson City Museum Project. Today is my last day, but I simply cannot read or scan any more documents. Seven full days in the archives was too many. So, I am taking time to write this post as a reflection on my trip while it is still fresh in my mind. 

I had a couple of goals for the week:

  1. Find archival material to support, expand on and address gaps in the interview data I have collected. 
  2. Engage in conversations with my community partner to direct the analysis and writing. 

I met my goals and am really happy with the work I accomplished. The following sections reflect on my successes and challenges in relation to these goals.

Then, I outline what you can expect to see for the project going forward, asking (as always) for feedback. 

Findings: Each section will contain a preliminary finding I think is interesting :). You can expect to see full posts on those topics soon… ish.

Digging through the Archives: Triangulation

For those who do not know, triangulation refers to having multiple sources to improve the credibility of research. Having multiple sources also makes the writing more interesting. In other words, documentary evidence can help verify and illustrate the interviews.

Archival data will be particularly helpful to support and demonstrate the relationships of significance to the Dawson City Museum. For instance:

  • During interviews I was told about Parks Canada’s important role in the Museum’s development. However, there were few specific examples and different people did not discuss the same example(s).
  • When searching archival materials, I found documents demonstrating Parks Canada’s help, including support for the stories I was told and new examples with multiple sources.

Finding One: The support that Parks Canada employees provided to the Dawson City Museum from the late 1970s to the 1990s is an example of implicit cultural policy and critical to the Museum’s professionalization. Examples include:

  • Parks contracted the Museum to conduct research, providing a form of financial assistance.
  • Conservators, curators, and engineers employed through Parks Canada gave the museum free advice and assistance.
  • Parks employees participated on the Museum’s Board of Directors and contributed to the Museum’s professionalization in the 1980s by establishing a committee structure as well as policies.

Success: The Museum’s corporate archives offered supporting materials that will help illustrate and verify the information provided in interviews.

Challenge: It is challenging when the archival materials and interview participants tell a different story. For example:

  • In interviews I heard a lot about the importance of advocacy and support from Parks Canada in prompting territorial funding for renovations in the 1980s. The participants did not discuss external factors.
  • In the archival material I found little evidence of advocacy. However, there was information documenting key external factors, such as the Museum failing a fire inspection as money became available for capital projects through the Canada Yukon Tourism Agreement.

How do you choose what narrative to privilege and tell as you analyze multiple sources of information that tell a different, but not contradictory, story?

Working with a Community Partner

The research project asks:

How has the Dawson City Museum evolved in relation to government policy and community action?

I am working with the Dawson City Museum to not only answer the question, but also communicate the answer(s) in ways that are most helpful to them (and my students).

As part of this community engaged scholarship, regular communication is important but phone calls are not the ideal venue for these kinds of discussions (in my opinion – I hate talking on the phone. I am a millennial). Additionally, due to the need for confidentiality we have had limited communication as I engaged in interviews.

Through conversations with my community partner while in Dawson, I have been able to articulate ideas and listen to feedback, which will inform the ongoing analysis.

For example, in interviews people often forget to mention summer student employment programs when discussing federal museum support. After I ask – “what about employment policies like Young Canada Works?”, they always discuss the significance of the program. My community partner (and Research Assistant – also a practitioner in the cultural sector) challenged my preconceptions about why this happens. In particular:

  • I believe practitioners forget about the program because it is rarely discussed in cultural policy conversations. Museum practitioners tend to only tell me about explicit museum policy, such as the Museums Assistance Program, and not the broader network of significant actions.
  • The community partner and research assistant challenged my assertion. They asserted that in practice people are probably forgetting that student employees are “student” employees because they are simply summer staff.

As a result, I am thinking differently about employment programs.

Finding two: Summer student employment is incredibly important to the Museum’s operation. However, before the 21st century, the Museum accessed a broader range of programs that targeted non-students and provided continuity in employment. The loss of these programs is, perhaps, more significant than the development of Young Canada Works in Heritage.

Success: We developed the themes below and had some wonderful conversations that informed my thinking about this project.

Challenge: Engaging with the community partner is easy when I am working in their space. As I return to working alone at my desk in another province, how do continue to involve the community partner in my analysis and research?

Moving Forward Themes

The analysis will result in content on the history of Dawson City, community museum policy in Yukon, and the evolution of the Dawson City Museum in terms of space and content. However, in order to answer:

How has the Dawson City Museum developed in relation to government policy and community action?

we have identified themes that draw connections between the Museum, its communities, and policy.

Finding three: These preliminary themes are:

  • Relationship with Parks Canada: Parks Canada is part of a broader heritage community and the policy is an implicit one that has evolved significantly due to cuts starting in the 1990s.
  • Response to Crisis: There are multiple instances where the local community responded to threats to the Museum, such as advocacy for the institution to the territorial government when funding challenges meant staff had to be let go.
  • Collections Development: The Museum does not have an active collecting policy and, as such, the local community has shaped the collection. We also see the influence of federal and territorial policy on its management.
  • Exhibition Development: The Museum uses project funding for major exhibition development and these projects have provided the impetus for relationship building with the Tr’ondëk Hwëch’in.
  • Staffing and Task Saturation: Historically and today, the Museum has relied on project and employment funding for staff. As a result, the one full-time year round Director has experienced periods of task saturation. For example, check out a former director’s blog on the subject here.
  • Museums as Tourism Agencies: The tourists are also a community the Museum serves and this is represented in the ways that museum policy is also a tourism policy.
  • Community of Museums: This is the most underdeveloped theme. I would expect to see a more active museum community that supports one another in Yukon…

Are there any key themes that seem missing to you?

Success: I think this is a great starting point and reflects a dialogue with my research assistant and the community partner.

Challenge: Are there too many themes? Which ones are most significant?

Questions

Here are the questions I asked in text:

  • How do you choose what narrative to privilege and tell as you analyze multiple sources of information that tell a different story?
  • As I return to working alone at my desk, how do continue to involve the community in my analysis and research?
  • Are there any key themes that seem missing to you?
  • Are there too many themes? Which ones are most significant?

I would also love to hear how you deal with fatigue when you have a short time to get as much done as possible on a project.

Thanks for reading! I am looking forward to developing these ideas and reflecting more in the coming weeks.

Democratization of Culture: OHS Keynote Presentation

On October 5th I gave a keynote presentation at the Ontario Historical Society’s AGM. It was a wonderful opportunity to reflect on my research more fully.

Here is the presentation:

OHS Resources

The Ontario Historical Society has some wonderful resources available online for researchers.

  • OHS Bulletin: These are a wonderful source for those wanting case studies and examples of historical societies’ activities over time. They were valuable to my research on Ontario Community Museum governance when doing my PhD.
  • Ontario History: As the name suggests, this is a journal about Ontario History. There are some great articles! I wrote an article about the OHS’ role in community museum development in their Spring 2021 issue here.
  • ELibrary: Members can access past publications. These are really neat. They provide insights on best practices and concerns for historic sites and societies over time.
  • Annual Reports: I am a big fan of reading annual reports. They provide insights into the organization’s development, but also the major concerns of heritage organizations from a policy perspective over time.

Questions

For those who watched the presentation, what do you think? What did I get wrong / right? Where should I be looking in future research to better understand the development of Canadian community museums?